Thursday, March 20, 2025

A CURSED MAN (2024) Premiering in LA Saturday, March 22nd and VOD on Tueday the 25th


Filmmaker Liam Le Guillou investigates whether or not there is anything to spirituality and the supernatural by having a cursed placed on himself…and then he tries to have it removed.

This is an intriguing documentary that actually shows the various ceremonies that Le Guillou is part of. It’s so atypical that the film begins with a warning saying that the filmmakers are not responsible if anything bad or strange happens to the viewer after watching the film.

For me the most interesting part of the film is not the ceremonies  but the discussions that happen around them. The confused nature of the various shaman, priests and practitioners is gripping. Their confusion that anyone would want to put themselves into any sort of danger intentionally or not is very real, if one wants proof of something why put yourself in danger to do so?

I liked A CURSED MAN. I liked that it didn’t cut away from the various ceremonies. I liked that there was serious discussions about the mature of the “supernatural”. In the age of flashy cable TV shows that amp up and over sell every moment, I like that the film was tethered to reality.

Worth a look.

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

ANY DAY NOW (2025)


Off beat comedy crime drama that is nominally about the Boston art robbery from ---- that still remains unsolved. The reality is it is a look at a bunch of guys who are on the fringes who are just trying to get out of their own way.

The plot of the film has a hood (Paul Guilfoyle) making the acquaintance of a security guard in an art museum (Taylor Gray). He’s deeply in debt and  Guilfoyle has an offer for him that could solve his problem.

This is a small gem of a film that isn’t what you expect. I don’t think the trailer or the official write ups do this justice. The reality is this film that is its own thing. It doesn’t really follow the typical plot lines and instead give us a collection of atypical characters who don’t do the typical gangster sort of things.  Actually this plays closer to life than the movies with everyone being people rather than characters.

Honestly I had a blast with this. I loved the characters and I loved that we weren’t going down the same crime riddled road that most other American gangster film gives us.  We aren’t watching a film full of cliched characters.

Is this the greatest thing since sliced bread? No, but god damn is it entertaining.

I should give one word of warning, that while the film is billed as a comedy it’s not fall down funny. There are some off kilter laughs, but it’s not a straight comedy. Its also not a straight on thriller either, as I said it is its own thing.

Recommended

FAIRY CREEK (2025)


This is a look at the Fairy Creek Protests in Canada which resulted in 1200 arrests when the protesters attempted to stop the logging of old growth forest.

This is an absolutely beautiful film  about the right/need to maintain nature and it’s beauty. It’s a film that goes deep into the protests showing us the protesters and the members of the First Nation fighting to maintain the forest.  It’s a film that demands to be seen on a big screen where the images can truly give you a sense of what is being fought over.

While the arc of the film is largely what you expect, the film still holds our attention because of the urgency of the telling.

I really liked the film.

Recommended- more so if you can see this on a truly BIG screen.

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Secret Mall Aprtment (2024) opens Friday

 


Jeremy Workman's latest film is a great deal of fun. It is the story of how a group artists built a secret apartment in the Providence Place Mall in 2023 and managed to remain there undetected for four years.

The press notes tell the story of how Workman had become friends with Michael Townsend in Greece. They were talking and Michael began to tell the story of how he and his friends had built this apartment in a mall that no one knew about and lived there for four years. Workman was entranced by the tale. However when Michael dropped the bomb that they and filmed the whole thing he knew he had to do something with the story. 

Continuing the wonderful run of films about people and stories you may or may not have heard about but should have, director Jeremy Workman brings us another delight. This is a film that is going to change how you look at public spaces. You will end up asking yourself could someone be hiding just outside of view. 

Explaining how it happened and why it might never happen again (circumstances collided correctly)  the film introduces us to some really fun people and lets us hang out with them as they relive this crazy thing they did. It's a film that will make you talk out loud as you lean in to see what is going to happen next.

I had an absolute blast watching this.

You'll forgive me for not saying too much about what happens, but so much of the delight of the film is seeing the things that happen along the way.

Easily one of the best films at this year's SXSW, it is highly recommended.

FISHBOWL (2023) is released Friday

 


Isel Rodriguez gives a staggering performance In THE FISHBOWL a film about a young woman trying to decide how to deal with the cancer that has reoccurred.

The plot of the film had Noelia (Rodriguez) running out on her partner and back home to her mother when it's clear her cancer is no longer in remission. There she reconnects with friends and family and ponders the damage done to the small island by the American military which left the landscape littered with unexploded bombs and poison.

While the script juggles way too many plot threads for a 90 minute film, we continue to watch and stay focused on what's happening because we fall in love with Rodriguez's performance. She lets it all hang out and we feel her pain, both physical and emotional. She brings us in and holds us close and as a result we are there for the duration. As a character study this film can't be beat.

This is one of my favorite films from  Sundance 2023

Recommended

Monday, March 17, 2025

AUM: THE CULT AT THE END OF THE WORLD (2023) opens Wednesday


This is the best film that I've seen on the Aum cult. I don't say that lightly having seen a good number of films both from the US and from Japan.

For those who don't know, the Aum cult gained infamy when the the cult released sarin gas in the Tokyo subway.  It was a move that put the group into spotlight that revealed all their dirty laundry. 

This film will tell you everything you want to know about the cult and then some. More importantly the film does what most other films doesn't do and that is put the cult into the context of Japan and the world.  The film also tells is clearly and susinctly what happened and why.  This is important because there have been several other docs that got lost in the teachings or lost talking to cult members

I loved this movie. This was the first time that I saw something on the cult where I didn't come away feeling they left something out.

If you love true crime this film is a must.

Devil's Stay (2025)


After a "succesful" exorcism results in the death of a young girl, weird thngs begin to happen at the funeral and it soon transpires that the demon that inhabited her never left.

I need to say at the out set that my having recently seen the similar Korean exorcism film DARK NUNS affected how I feel about this film. While the plots are not really similar there are enough simularities, owing to the subgenre of horror, that I found myself comparing them. That's not really fair but it happened.

The reason it happened is that this film has very deliberate structure. The film starts with a truly frightening sequence where the sounds of an exorcism fills a families house. Its one of the most chilling sequences of the last few years and it sets the stage for what is to come. After the explosive first sequence the film switches modes to a slow burn tale that slowly builds to the conclusion. While the slow build is fine unto itself it suffers from having come after a gangbusters sequence. My interest waivered.

This isn't to suggest that the film is bad or doesn't work, more that you need patience until the film clicks again. Once it does its creepy again.

My own reservations aside I had a good time and I look forward to hunkering down with the film again on some dark and rainy night.

Recommended.

Misericordia (2024) opens Friday


Alain Guiraudie's MISERICORDIA starts off as if wants to be a Hitchcockian thriller,  but it not so quickly descends into bedroom farce where it should have been from the start.

The film begins when a former employee man comes to the home of his former employer for his funeral and he ends up committing murder. Things become complicated as he tries to not let anyone know what happened.

Never getting the tone right MISERICORDIA flounders for much of it's running time. Not much happens. And up to a certain point you will be asking if it is this a comedy or a thriller? It isn't clear until almost the very end. 

Complicating everything is the fact that Guiraudie doesn't tell us anything about any of the characters. Lots of details are not in the film, such as the lead character being a former employee. Everyone has a back story they clearly know but at the same time we are not let in to any of it. What exactly is everyone's relationship? I have no clue because it isn't in the film (it is all revealed the press notes). The characters aren't cipher's they are voids.

It isn't until the murder happens that the questions as toi what is happening stop because we get a sort of narrative thrust. And it isn't until the film falls fully into farce that the film finds it's tone. But by that time the film is a complete mess even if we are laughing at it. (And don't bring the kids since erections are used as punchlines twice)

Yea I kind of liked it but this really should have been better.

Worth a shot

Sunday, March 16, 2025

Remaining Native (2025) SWSW 2025


This is is a portrait of Ku Stevens, a 17 year old young man  living on the Yerington Paiute reservation in Nevada. He is a long distance runner who dreams of going to the University of Oregon. As Stevens trains and tries to get noticed by college recruiters he ponders his great grandfather  who fled one of infamous religious schools designed to make Native American children into good little Christian kids.  His grandfather ran 50 miles into the desert to find his freedom, its a story that haunts him.

This winner at SXSW is a good portrait of a young man trying to come to terms with the present while reclaiming his family's history. It's a good portrait of a good young man trying to make a difference. It's also a film that makes the story of the children much more real than many other documentaries that deal with the stolen childen that keep things at arms length. 

If you are interesteted in the tragedy of Native American children and a want to see a great bio, then this film is for you.

A Pause

 I mentioned a week or so ago I was running behind in my posting. The good news is I've kind of caught up.

The bad news is that getting there, coupled with couple of slates full ofilms that left me wondering "why am I still watching this crap" and watching the souless corporate disaster ELECTRIC STATE have made me need to step back. I need to step away from the steady diet of PR prepared cinematic choices. I need to watch more movies for me for a while.

Yes I will review the New Directors Titles I have and I will finish the other titles I requested (many of which I genuinely am interested in) but I taking a break and mostly doing me movies

What this means is after this week and into early April look for the quantity of pieces to fall. Hopefully the quality will go back up because there are a couple of up coming pieces that I cobbled together from hope and bullshit. The feeling positive or negative is genuine, but the pieces should have been just two sentences long not several paragraphs.

Now to begin to do fun stuff and look at Matt's list of titles so we can try this podcast thing again

Liz Whittemore on American Dreamer (2022) which is getting a Digital Download from 17th March in the UK

 With AMERICAN DREAMER getting a digital download in the UK, here is Liz Whittemore's review from 2022's Tribeca


There’s something about Peter Dinklage that makes him a brilliant leading man. Tribeca 2022 film American Dreamer is another example of his ability to captivate on screen. In Paul Dektor‘s feature directorial debut, Dinklage plays adjunct social economics professor and lecturer Dr. Phil Loder. As he speaks eloquently to his students, we witness a sly Indian Jones hommage from the front row. Perusing real estate porn, as so many of us do regularly, Phil is serious about finding his slice of heaven and stability in his career. Chasing tenure and respect, he stumbles across a deal in the classifieds that seems too good to be true. With the assistance of his smarmy real estate agent, played to perfection by Matt Dillon, Phil purchases an enormous estate. But there is a catch. His contract contains a “live-in” clause for the previous owner. 

Phil has sold his soul to a woman named Astrid. Thought to be on her deathbed, unpredictable circumstances lead Phil to hire a private detective (Danny Glover) while navigating a complicated relationship with Astrid and her skeptical daughter Maggie. The script dives into the mythic “American Dream” and what the concept means to each of us. Screenwriter Theodore Melfi allows MacLaine and Dinklage to do their proverbial thing. I was hypnotized by the ease of their scenes together. 

Shirley MacLaine brings her truest form with sass and spitfire. Her ability to make you smirk and piss you off is a gift. She’s a legend, and Dinklage keeps pace at every turn. Peter Dinklage has mastered the art of charming his costars and the audience. After watching him in Cyrano, his sex symbol status became solidified. In American Dream, Melfi and Dektor allow him to woo in only the way Peter can woo. Picturing him as a man that constantly has women in the palm of his hand is sheer perfection. His comic timing is unmatched. The magic permeates throughout his fully fleshed-out portrayal of a flawed man.

American Dreamer wins with a great score and soundtrack, stunning locations, funny fantasy sequences, and some clever transitions in the form of novel chapters. I had no idea where this plot was going, and damnit, that’s rare. It is easy to say that it is one of my Top 3 films from the festival this year. I cannot wait for larger audiences to experience this beguiling comedy when it inevitably gets distribution. You’re gonna love it.

Nora (2025) Cinequest 2025


A woman who gave up her singing career for a family, begins to rethink the choice when her husband goes on tour and leaves her to be a single mom.

Anna Campbell is a one woman band writing,diecting, starring and compsing NORA and should celebrated for doing so. There is some really good moments here and I want to see what comes next.

At the same time the film has one problems that hurts it.  The problem wth the film is the intergration of the music into the tale. While the performance sequences are fine, there are other sequences that are music videos. These sequences don't really feel as part of the film. They feel like the sequences were  created by someone not connected to the rest of the film. It feels like Campbells script was written with spaces left for the insertion of a musical sequence. Its not fatal but it hurts the film.

Uneven insertion of music aside NORA is worth a look.

Voices Carry (2025) Cinequest 2025

 


A Sam and Jack retreat to Sam’s ancestral home. There she becomes reacquainted with her childhood neighbor and she finds an old diary- which triggers weird feelings and strange experiences.

This is a well-made, if very low key thriller about the unwinding of a young woman.  The cast is excellent with Jeremy Holm shining as the eccentric neighbor. It’s a cozy film that pulls us in and drags us along.

As good as the film is the film’s low key nature works against it. The plot is similar to other supernatural thrillers so with out a heavy dose of suspense the film, while good, is less compelling than it should be.  The truth of the matter is that the film isn’t just a thriller, it is rooting around and examining Sam’s life and mental state. The film doesn’t just want to scare but also wants us to think. That sets the film nicely apart from the rest of the pack, but it will disappoint anyone who wants a nail biting thriller.

I liked the film and if you want something that isn’t your typical thriller, it is recommended.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

Deeper (2025) SXSW 2025


This is a portrait of Dr Richard Harris, best known as one of the divers who rescued the Thai soccer team who got trapped in the  flood cave with no way out. The film charts his life and accomplishments as he prepares to go deeper into the Pearse Resurgence, a flooded cave in New Zealand. 

This is a good, if routinely told tale, made interesting by the gorgeous photography. You are going to want to see this film on a big screen  because the cave diving images will take your breath away.  

I really liked this film a great deal. Sure it covers a bunch of the material that previous cave rescue films covered but it expands them and fills out Harris's story with the dive into the Resurgence.

Recommended, more so if you want to see some truly spectacular dive sequences.

The truly great anti-war film/ horror movie Operation Undead (2024) hits home video Tuesday


The programmers of NYAFF have buried one of their best films in the late night slot which is a shame because people other than night owls deserve to see this glorious rethink of the zombie genre.

Set during the Second World War the film has the Thai government surrendering to the Japanese after they see the effect of a new chemical weapon that turns people into zombie like beings. The turned men are faster, largely unkillable and cannibalistic. The idea is that there will be a brief show of resistance and the surrender-but the the brief skirmish releases one of the test subjects who quickly begins to turn the Thai soldiers and civilians.

What starts off as an amusing film turns by degrees darker as it becomes a bloodbath and then into a brutally sad film as some of those turned have animalistic cravings but also their morals and memories. They continue to do terrible things but can't stop themselves. It's crushing.

Brilliantly made, it is wonderful rethink of the the zombie genre that gives us much to think about even as the blood and guts are flying. It is a very serious very well thought out pondering about the cost of war and violence on ourselves and out psyches. (It's a blood relative to Ted Geoghegan's BROOKLYN 45 because of the similar themes)

While I am certain that some people are not going to like some of the more serious turns, the film stands tall because of it's refusal to play by anyone's , even the genres rules. If you can accept that you are going to end up having found one of the great anti-war films of the last few years, not to mention one hell of a horror film

Highly recommended

BEING MARIA (2024) Rendezvous with French Cinema 2025


This is a look at actress Maria Schneider before, during and after the making of THE LAST TANGO IN PARIS.

I'm not certain what I'm supposed to think about this film. The film is focused on the troubled life of Schneider during an infamous period in her life, and it seems to wallow in the unahappiness of her life. I know the shooting of the film was unpleasant, but this film seems skewed to make sure we feel that. The film doesn't feel like it's being a fair apprasial of her life. Things seem to be too cut and dried, the complexity of her life is reduced to bullet points. 

The film might have worked better had the filmmaking been better. Looking and feeling like the wrong sort of low budget film the film never feels real. Yes, the cast is fine, including Matt Dillion who frequently nails being Marlon Brando, the script works against them (see the bullet point reference above)

I don't know if I can recommend it this film, it's just not what it should have been.

Friday, March 14, 2025

Zodiac Killer Project (2024) First Look 2024


When Charlie Shakleton's plans for a documentary about the Zodiac killings centered around a certain book on the crime are squashed when the rights are withheld, he instead regroups and gives us an explanation of what the film would have been.

This is kind of like an illustrated lecture or illustrated podcast as Shackleton's voice over explains the things we are seeing (I would have used ia shot like this to begin the film). The film is weirdly hypnotic as we fall into his tale trying to make the film and his view of the Zodiac killings.  The result is a film that echoes the work of Patrick Kiellor's Robinson films or the early work of Peter Greenaway, except that this is more or less a straight on documentary.

I was locked into the film during it's run time. Being a  true crime nerd with an interest in the Zodiac case I was intrigued by how Shackleton put it all together. Additionally somewhere in the middle of the film that had this been a conventional film it would have said a great deal less with a great deal more effort.

Definitely worth your time, more so if you are a true crime nut, the ZODIAC KILLER PROJECT is one of the must sees of the First Look Fest.

SONGS OF SLOW BURNING EARTH (2024) First Look 2025


This is an observational look at the early days of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. We watch the people try to sort out what was happening, their flight to safety and the damage that resulted.

This is a low key film of just observation. It's a beautifully told film that just shows us what the early days of the war was like.

The trouble is that I can't really review this film. My feelings are much too wrapped up in the fact that I have seen too many other films on the Ukraine war. The film is similar to other films (INTERCEPTED, FREEDOM ON FIRE, RULE OF TWO WALLS, IN THE REARVIEW among others) in looking at the early days of the war. While the film is very good on its own terms, I've seen a few too many films on the early days of the war. 

That said, this is probably the film people should see first.

This is very good and recommended for anyone who is interested in what is happening in Ukraine.

Thursday, March 13, 2025

WHEN THE PHONE RANG (2024) First Look Festival 2025


WHEN THE PHONE RANG begins with a undesired call that a young girl’s grandfather has past away. It is the first of a series of events that will alter her life as Yugoslavia dissolves and war breaks out.

Told in a style where events play out in almost tableaus with  little dialog and an observers voice over. It’s a move that keeps us distances as most of the information we are getting is from the narration and not the people on screen. We are being told a story, which is why the images are perfectly chosen.

For me it’s too constructed. I never fully connected, I like to connect to characters on screen on their terms not that of an outside observer. (this is an issue with some documentaries because it becomes clear we are not seeing events as they happen but as the director chooses to portray them.) We never get a real sense what anyone is feeling but we told of their emotions, and thus we are being told what we should be feeling. For me this is a sign the director doesn’t trust the audience.

Pete Browngard Talks The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie


I saw Pete Browngardt‘s THE DAY THE EATH BLEW UP: A LOONEY TUNES MOVIE because I asked for it when it ran as part of the Animation is Film Festival a couple of months back.   To be honest I had no hope for it. Most of the recent long form Looney Tunes films have not been good (or scrapped) so my expectations was very low.  After the film was finished I found myself delighted  and I felt it was one of the best films (full stop) of 2024. (My review is here). I also found myself in the middle of some social media discussions about the film because people here in the US wanted to know about the film.

A couple of weeks ago I was contacted about possibly doing an interview with director Browngardt.  Normally I balk at doing interviews, however the film was too good not to talk about the film with the man behind it.

I had a blast doing the interview. Pete just went and what was supposed to be a 15 minute interview doubled, in part because we started a little earlier, but mostly because we kept going and blew through the stop signal. (We were bonding over being Long Island natives and a love of Hundreds of Beavers)

What follows is  most of our discussion. I removed the talk of Long Island, but pretty much everything else is here.  It’s a great discussion of making the film,  of making films under the current Warners regime and of a way to make Looney Tunes relevant a again.

I want to thank Alexandra at 42 West for setting up the interview and for  Pete for taking the time to talk to a fan.


STEVE: Hi, Pete. Thank you for absolutely one of the best films of the year. I genuinely feel that way. I think it was actually on my vote. Just so you know, it was in my voting for the New York Film Critics Online as best animated film or one of the best animated films. 

PETE:, That's so nice of you. Thank you. 

STEVE: I want to begin with how is it that you managed to make such a wonderful film with 11 credited writers? I've never seen a film with, say, more than, three or four writers that's any good, and you have 11 credited writers. 

PETE: And they're all good writers, too. I'll explain that one. 

So, basically, I'm a storyboarder. I started animation pretty much as a storyboard artist for Cartoon Network. And we would get outlines, and we would have to write and board the story. There was no script. It was just sort of a page of what should happen. And we got writing credit on that. Because we are writers. We're writing this. 

And then every project after that I'm going to try storyboard artists writing credit because they are writing. We are writing it, not just the pictures, because pictures speak a thousand words. We are writing the dialogue, changing the dialogue, rewriting situations, reimagining the whole script at times, throwing the whole script out and starting over and rewriting. And a lot of people don't realize how much storyboard artists do in animation. And Steve Hillenburg, when he made The Spongebob Squarepants movie, he got Paramount to give the storyboard artists credit on that. They had a smaller storyboard artist crew on that. We just happened to have a little bit of a larger crew, and that's why there's that many credit. But basically, there are two actual writers that only work in the word form in that credit list, and everyone else is a storyboarder.

It's like saying, is Charles Schultz the writer of Peanut? He draws it and he writes it. It's the same for storyboarders.

That's how I look at it. And I feel like it's one of my proudest achievements of getting the studio to agree, and I had to really make the case and show the evidence of it to get it. And I wish more studios gave, and more storyboard artists got credit for writing it because they deserve it.

STEVE: With previous Looney Tunes movies you never felt like it was one story from start to finish. And with this film, it's a one story from start to finish. And not only is it one story from start to finish, you've got all the characters arcing. I don’t think you  see that in any other Looney Tunes film. You get a little bit of backstory or this or that. But this is the first time where you actually have character arc...

PETE: Yeah, that was from the get go. I knew that's what it had to be. I knew walking in when I pitched it to Warner Brothers that no one is going to watch just a long Looney Tunes short. It has to have an emotional arc. And Porky and Daffy, being a buddy situation, they are the only two Looney Tunes characters that aren't always trying to kill each other. They lend each other to give that vehicle to tell an emotional story and give those arcs in the film and storytelling of the film. I knew if we were going to make this right and tell a 90 minute story, have an audience engaged in it, it was a must. 

And it was also one of the hardest things to do on the film. Is to go, well what is it? How do you not overdo it? How do you not underdo it? How do you find the balance? It was challenging. And it was a lot of trial and error, a lot of feeling it out. And we all, we were saying, well the writers, we would all be on Zoom calls together and we'd talk for hours upon hours, sitting just like this, talking through and sketching up ideas. Because we made the film during COVID, so we weren't in the room together. But we were in the virtual room. And it was important. And then we tracked it. And we had two great heads of the story, Ryan Kramer and David Dimmel, who sort of supervised the story department. And then myself, just overseeing the whole thing and making sure it does it.

STEVE: How much did Warners leave you alone? What did you have to give them? How much did you have to argue? 

PETE:  So a couple things helped me with this. First of all, when I first worked for Warner Brothers, I did a large number of short Looney Tunes films for Max. We did 209. And they liked what I did with that. Also, when I walked in to pitch that project to them the bar with Looney Tunes at Warner Brothers was very, very low. It was a couple of TV series that didn't really hit. They didn't know what to do with it. So I think their hands were up in the air a little bit. So, I went in and I said, well, you guys are changing stuff. Don't change it. Just make more, as best you can in this modern age.  Which is hard because TV production, animation production is so different. It's so piecemealed and farmed out to places. So that helped me, and that was well-received.

Those were critically well-received. A lot of people haven't seen them because of the streaming wars and all that. We kind of got stuck on Max. But the people that have seen them really liked them. We've won a bunch of awards with those, with festivals and whatnot. So that gave me a lot of cachet, you know, as far as them listening to me when we were making it.

Also, it was streaming boom. We were a low-budget, $15 million budget. So the eyes are on it. That's why we survived, too. We had one of the lowest-budget films. They were axing all the films. And also the quality of our film. I think I put together a great team. I think we were showing results, everything they were seeing they were liking. And it still was an uphill battle. But they did leave me alone. 

Let me put it this way, they were smart enough to leave me alone and leave my team alone. 

STEVE: I have to ask this because this was right before I spoke with you I had seen something quick on Coyote vs. Acme. Were you ever fearful that ever a possibility that they would just junk the film like Coyote?

PETE: 100%, 100%, absolutely. Every day while we were in production, when that started to begin, not just that movie but Batgirl  and David Zaslov taking over, I was waiting for the phone call every single day. And that adds to the stress and emotions that go into when you're making a film and how much hard work it is, to have that in the back of your head was hard.

And Ketchup Entertainment saved this film. Warner Brothers was smart enough to allocate funds to finish the film because we were at a low budget and I think they were able to squeeze it out. But if it wasn't for Ketchup Entertainment, we would be sitting on a shelf somewhere.

And GFM. GFM, they did international distribution, sort of led up to Ketchup  being the movie. And the  reception at Annecy saved the film.

STEVE:  I was sent the film as a screener for Animation is Film. And when I posted the review, people went bananas saying that, because apparently they were afraid that the release is going to be bad because this is played elsewhere in the world and it still hasn't played here.  Has it made enough money overseas that it's going to be a to hit? Or are you going to have to rely on what happens here in the US?

PETE: It's very important, in the film business, if you really want your film to get some traction and seen, domestic release is the way. You have to have a domestic release. 

It's just very, very important. Internationally, it's great. And we got a lot of good buzz internationally, but Ketchup coming on and securing the distribution rights on that is huge, and putting some money behind it to not only get some attention for award season, but also to put it out for 1,500 screens in February 28th next year, this coming year, a couple weeks, two months away, whatever it is. It's just monumental. And I just hope, I mean, I don't know the financial budget, I mean, not budget, I know, I don't know how much money it's made. I'm not at the studio anymore. They don't tell me that stuff, so I don't really know.

STEVE: There’s all these lovely little references in the film, and you balance it so that you don't have them screaming to be noticed, everything's not glaring of, like, this is a reference to this film and this is a reference to that film. You have different shifts in style… How difficult was that? How did you balance that? Because you hit it, like, perfectly, so that it's not too much, it doesn't over power the story. How did you decide what you were going to do? Like, the stylistic changes and stuff of the art?

PETE: Really, just by instinct, and the instinct of some of the other people on the film working with me. I feel like we have better taste. I mean, I'm just not going to lie. I think people, they think of animation in a certain way. It's got to be loud and screaming, or it's got to be overdone with this, and, oh, you have to have this in it. People always go like this. But I feel no, you can do anything you want. You can tell any type of story. You can tell it any way. You can paint it any way, color it any way. You can paste it any way. You can act it any way. It's the most incredible medium of film storytelling, and it's not utilized in a broad sense enough of a variety, in my opinion. So I think it's that, and they left us alone. They left us alone. And, yeah, I just truly believe it's just my sensibility and taste to go, no, that's cheesy, that's dumb, or I don't like that, or, you know, eh, I've seen that before. I'm a harsh critic. I'm very hard on myself and on what I like. I like good stuff. I try to make good stuff the best I can. So I really think it's that, you know.

And there is a balancing with that, too, it's just like some of it happens, like, well, we don't have enough money to do that extra two shots, so we've got to figure out how to make it into one shot, and it turns out to be better, you know. All I can say is it's instinctual a lot of times when you're in the trenches making it because things are happening so fast and you're moving fast, even for animation, like you have deadlines and shit has to get done, and you just have to trust your gut. And I'm lucky enough that I got to make a lot of television. It's really helped me to be able to be confident in my decision-making. 

STEVE: Was it always going to be Porky and Daffy as the lead? 

PETE: Yeah, always. Because it's just they're not the characters that sell T-shirts, that's for sure. You know, I mean, it was up to the studio, it would have been  the Bugs Bunny Tweety Bird movie. You know, those are the ones that sell the merchandise. But the film wouldn't have worked with anybody.

And  to be honest with you, the one thing that they've done wrong so many times is they put all the Looney Tunes living together or hanging out together. They don't work that way. The Looney Tunes don't work where, you know, Bugs is hanging out with Foghorn Leghorn and they're roommates. It doesn't work that way. And they think that they can disrespect what was created and throw them all together just because it's like, well, we want them all, we want to sell all the T-shirts, you know. But it doesn't work that way.

So luckily they let us just do this cast of these characters that I thought would work the best to tell their story. 

STEVE: Which actually brings me to my next question because you have the great directors, the films that Chuck Jones did and Frizz Freeling and Bob Clampett and everybody else, they did all these films where they worked on individual characters and stuff. Do you think that if they had done a feature film… if they were allowed to just do the feature film, do you think they would have done something that was very close to this? 

PETE: Oh, well, I doubt it.. Let me just put it that way. I don't know about that. They're the greatest animation directors that have ever lived. So it's kind of hard to know what they would do.

But there is a great little story, and I don't know, I'm sort of paraphrasing, I don't know the details of the story, but there is a legendary story where they brought Chuck Jones on to the Warner Brothers to show him the original Space Jam. And after the screening, he said such poor things about the film and that they ruined the character that he helped create that he was escorted off the lot. So I don't think it was that movie that Chuck would make, or Clampett, or Frizz, or Robert McKimson, or Avery, or any of the greats, you know, really.

STEVE: The reason I asked is, it's like if you watch some of the stuff that Chuck Jones did where he was doing stuff like Rikki-Tikki-Tavvi, and he was doing certain other things later on, you have these arcs that were never in the short films. I always had the sense that they wanted to do more. 

PETE: I think so too, especially in their prime, I think so. You know, it's a thing where it's a shame that they didn't get a chance to do sort of longer form stuff like this. And it's a Hollywood thing where you get pigeon holed. You're the one guy that does, this is all you do. 

It happens with actors, it happens with filmmakers, it happens with screenwriters, everything, right? It’s a shame, but yeah, I mean, what it is is that I do believe that my team and myself have the respect, and we did our homework the best we could, and the love of what those geniuses did before us. And they basically give you the manual of how to do it, but no one's read the manual.

We decided to go back and read the manual, and we were reading the manual our whole career. So that's pretty much what it is. I mean, I've been in meetings at Warner Brothers where we have to tell them what the character is, because they don't even know, but they're telling us what to do.

It's kind of maddening in a lot of ways, but that's the truth, that's the truth. You've got to do your homework, and you've got to love it, and you've got to respect it. And we do. I respect it tremendously. Another question is because you've made a feature film, that's a feature film, and it's genuinely that. And it doesn't have completely the story structure of the shorts.

STEVE: You've made a feature film. So I was curious as to who are your favorite animators or filmmakers? And even live action, because I was talking to the director of  Flow, and he was saying  the film wasn’t influenced by animators but by regular directors like Sergio Leone and others.

PETE:  Oh I'm a huge, huge filmmaking, film fan, film cinephile. I'm in my office now, you can't see it, but still, Blu-rays and books on cinema. I mean, I love Tim Burton. Tim Burton's a huge milestone in my career, early Tim Burton films. Basically made me want to be an animator filmmaker, because that's what he was. And Paul Reubens and Pee Wee, huge, hugely. I went to Cal Arts because of them, both of them. I was like, they both went to Cal Arts, that's the school for me. 

And I got into it. But other filmmakers that I love, I love Hal Ashby. I love Preston Sturgess.  It goes on and on. I love the Zucker Brothers. I think they're amazing filmmakers that don't get enough credit as filmmakers. Comedians, comedic writers and comedic filmmakers. I mean, I could go on and on. Kubrick, Scorsese, all the greats, of course. But as the deep cut stuff, I love horror directors. I love John Carpenter, Sam Raimi. Coen Brothers, huge Coen Brothers. I love the Coen Brothers.

Old films, John Ford. My father got to meet John Ford and watch a film with John Ford. I learned about John Ford films. My father was an officer in the military, and John Ford was making military films in Europe. And he got invited to the office recorder, and they actually watched a film, a John Ford film, together on 16mm. My dad also met Walt Disney. Walt Disney is one of my favorite filmmakers. Walt Disney could be the greatest American filmmaker that ever lived, in my opinion. In live action or as a storyteller. I mean, who else has done what he's done? I'm waiting for the Ken Burns... The history of animation. Let's get that going, because... It's such a... It's a little bit off-subject, but I think The three greatest things of American culture is jazz, baseball, and cartoons.

STEVE:  Oh yeah, he's done two of them. 

PETE: But yeah, yeah, hugely influenced by film. I study film. I read books. I love making up stuff. Oh, I love Alexander Payne. I love Election. I think Election is a masterpiece. Just a huge film fan. And I always tell people…. I meet younger people getting into the business and in animation, and they haven't seen a lot of these classic films, and I go, you just pick a director and watch every single movie. I did that. I lived in New York for my 20s, and I would go to a Kims' Video, and I would go to some of those other video stores out there.  They had everything in director, and I would just go watch every single movie, every day. You know, that was my life. 

STEVE:The one thing I have to say is, if you love Tim Burton, there's a documentary series that's coming out, which is absolutely one of the best things I've ever seen on film. It's one of the best filmmaker things I've ever seen. 

PETE: It's about him?

STEVE: It's about him. It played at Tribeca, and everybody's in it. But it tells you about how he made all his films. It also tells how he made everybody else better, and how he influenced everybody else. He's incredible. You're going to love it.

PETE: He's incredible. I can't wait. I have a whole little archive of Tim Burton, behind-the-scenes stuff of anything he's done, because he didn't do a lot of interviews early on and stuff, especially when he was at Disney and stuff like that. 

And there's a lot of footage that's becoming unearthed of him making Vincent with Rick Heinrichs. Rick Heinrichs is one of the great production designers of our time, and they worked together on their early films at Disney, Frankenweenie and Vincent, and even the early Nightmare Before Christmas test. 

What a journey. And I live in Burbank. I live in Tim Burton land. It's quite a place. You see where it all ends. All these houses are like, oh yeah, this is Edward Scissorhands. Now I get it. 

What is it called, though?

STEVE: It was called THE TIM BURTON DOCUSERIES. I watched the episode that they ran multiple times, and I don't do that at film festivals

And I want you to know that you're sitting there talking about Hal Ashby and all these other guys, and I'm having my smile going wider and wider because because you're mentioning filmmakers who are not the typical people, which I absolutely loved. 

PETE: Yeah, I owe a lot to my brother. My brother's an editor in a film, and he's older than me. He's a decade older than me, and he was making films, and we just learned about all these great... Filmmakers, a lot of people don't know about. 

There's so much great stuff that people don't know that's out there, and it's just such an awesome...

Do you know what I just saw and loved? I just saw Hundreds of Beavers. I loved it. 

My kids watched. We watched it together, and I have a nine-year-old and a 12-year-old, and they can get in it with each other, you know? And it was this amazing bonding thing where they were dying laughing, crying laughing. We all were watching this film. And that's a Looney Tunes film. If you want to see how a Looney Tunes live-action film would be, there it is.

We can do one more if you want to do one more. 

STEVE: No, no, no, no, no. You've given me more than I could have hoped for and you've made me smile thank you so much. Thank you for the movie.

The Day The Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie (2024) opens Friday


Seemingly coming from nowhere and seemingly unexpectedly wonderful THE DAY THE EARTH BLEW UP is a glorious feature film starring Porky and Daffy, who along with Petunia, end up fighting an alien invasion.

And when I said this is a feature film, I meant it. The film is not a series of black out sketches but a genuine feature film with a beginning middle and ending. There are blackout pieces but the film is entirely focused on a narrative thrust. Honestly the film shouldn't work, you shouldn't have eleven people credited its writing it and still have it work...and it does...pretty much flawlessly.

What makes the film work is that the film gets the characters dead on right and expands them. The film charts Daffy and porky's friendship from when they were kids to now. It lets them grow and be real people and yet the same characters. When the farmer who raised them essentially dies, we are moved. There are other deeply emotional moments, say Porky discovering and being frightened by Petunia, that bring out genuine emotions that you never really felt with any Looney Tunes project previously.  I never teared up with Looney Tunes before.

The best thing I can say is that this is on the level of the best animation being turned out today. It stands shoulder to shoulder with most of the great animated films of the last decade. Watching the film I was struck that the film would make a brilliant co-feature with WALLACE AND GROMIT VENGEANCE MOST FOUL, the film from Aardman and Netflix because it's a film that takes classic characters and breathes new life into them. There are emotions and complexity in both films that raise the stakes.

This film is one of the best film in the Looney Tunes canon and it is a film that probably would have delighted Chuck Jones, Friz Freling, Bob Clampett and the other animators because it shows how the creators of today built on what they did and went in directions they could only have hoped to go.(Warner studio heads would never have gone for a feature, never mind one with this much complexity and emotion.)

This is one one of the great films  and great finds of 2024. I honestly had little hope for this and instead founf myself completely blown away.

Highly recommended.

It's on the festival circuit and it's going to be released early next year- go.

Wednesday, March 12, 2025

UVALDE MOM (2025) SXSW 2025


This is nominally the story of Angeli Rose Gomez who ran into the Robb Elementary school in Uvalde Texas to get her kids out from the clutches of a mass shooter. They then handcuffed her when she tried to go back in. The film also deals with what the incident revealed, namely inequality in the school system and problems with Texas’ gun laws.

This is a good documentary with a lot on its mind. While Gomez’s story is the focal point the film is actually about a lot of other things such as the fact that the school is poorer and largely non-white meant that repairs to doors were not prioritized. It also shows how the community views the various segments.  It’s a wide eyed look at our broken society. If you need to know how broken it all is consider that Gomez was arrested for trying to save her people.

I liked this film but I didn’t love it. While I love what the film is saying and the story it is telling, I found that the film never generated enough emotion to put it over. I should have been shaken to my core instead of just thinking that’s nice.

Lack of emotional punch aside, UVALDE MOM will  give you a lot to think about and as such is recommended.

The Fifth Shot of La Jetée (2024) plays First Look 2025 Friday


Director Dominique Cabrera's cousin sees Chris Marker's LE JETE and becomes convinced that the image is of himself and his parents. This begins a crazy quest to figure out if this was indeed the case and along the way we get a look at the changes in society since the early 1960's, the Algerian war, immigration, film making, photography, Chris Marker and the director's family.

For those who don't know LE JETE is a science fiction short (kind of remade as Terry Gilliam's 12 MONKEYS) about a dystopian future where a man with a vivid memory of his past is part of an experiement to go back in time to change the past to save the future. It's told almost entirely with voice over and stills.

This is a great ride. The quest to find out if this is indeed the directors cousin is a compelling one.  It's a really cool detective story that had me dying to know what happened next. I also enjoyed all of the other threads that are  inside the film as well.

As compelling as the film is, the film has one small problem which will not take away from your enjoyment of the film, and that is I don't know if I need to see it again. Yes I enjoyed it, yes I am whole heartedly recommending it, but I don't know if will require a second viewing because once the story is told and we get to the end, you realize that while the mystery is compelling, the story telling is not. It's a lot of people sitting looking at screens. Its not visually engaing. DOn't get me wrong, I love the film and I highly recommend it, but I don't know if you'll revisit it.

PLANET B (2024) Rendezvous WIth French Cinema 2025


Ten years in the future a bunch of activists disappear and are transported  to a far off wold called Planet B

Feeling a film made by people who really don't understand either science fiction or political films PLANET B is full of over used science fiction and dystopian world political views. It's a film that is operating in a world that raises more questions than it answers. It is a film that feels like any number of other better films.

I'm not really going to talk about this film much owing to the fact that when we got to the denouncement, which, I kind of suspected early I simply screamed at the screen. It was a scream that was repeated when one character stated out loud what what was going on well after we knew.

While not a bad film, the truth is this should have been a B scifi film without pretensions and running a half an hour shorter.

A miss.

Unseen Olympics (2025) Thessaloniki International Documentary Film Festival

This is a meditative doc shot on out dated film at the 2023 Fédération Internationale du Sport Universitaire (FISU, the International University Sports Federation) Winter and Summer World University Games in Lake Placid in the United States and in Chengdu in the People’s Republic of China.

This old school film that harkens back to some of the sports documentaries of the 1970’s and 80’s. It’s a look not so much at the sports at the competition but everything going on around them. It’s a trippy little film that puts us in a specific head space that transcends the typical. It’s a film that is very much intent on putting us into a specific state on mind.

I was delighted. This film took me out of the room I was in and sent me somewhere else. I have no idea what I am supposed to get out of it, and frankly I don’t care. I don’t care because the film forced me to start to rethink not only about sports but about other things as well.

This is a glorious trip.

I can not wait to see this again- preferably on a huge theater screen.

Highly recommended.

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Savages (2024) NYICFF 2025


SAVAGES is a scathing animated adventure film with a dark side and a biting social commentary. It’s a film that shows that some filmmakers trust the children in the audience to deal with weighty subjects.

The film follows a a young girl who lives on a planation in Borneo. Her father works for the company that is logging the jungle bare. When they witness the members of a crew kill an ape, they rescue the baby and take it home. Things become complicated when the girls cousin arrives from the jungle to go to school. When he flees civilization she gives chase. Eventually she ends up in conflict with the loggers.

This is a very adult film from the director of MY LIFE AS A ZUCCHINI. It’s a film with death and real world consequences for actions. While it tones things down a bit, there is real danger of things going badly. Things are not sugar coated to nonexistence.

That said, while it’s a good film and one I admire, I’m still not sure what I think of it. The tone is a bit uneven and the ending seems like unearned wishful thinking. The film should have hit me harder.

Still its good enough on its own terms and far enough removed from Hollywood crap that the film is highly recommended.

HEEBIE JEEBIES at NYICFF 2025

I was lucky enough to go to the only screening of HEEBIE JEBIES at NYICFF. It was packed and a blast.


HAIRY SCARY is one of the Gleeful Beast shorts filling the festival. 

JUST LITTLE IMPS is about a young girl who knows there are monsters in the dark. It's funny with a great denouncent.

HAUNTING CALL OF A MAJESTIC BEAST a monster yells for Steven. Another Gleeful Beast short

BUG this is a mostly great film. Its the story of a father and daughter when a bug arrives. Its a film that works until the ending.

IMPOSSIBLE MALADIES is the story of a doctor specializing in weird diseases in the 18th century. I want a feature film

A GUEST FROM ELSEWHERE is the story of a beast looking for connection. It's a good film that is a bit derivative

JEREMY WHERE IS THE LIFE JACKET- funniest of the Gleeful Beasts films if you love Monty Python style humor. I hurt myself from laughing.

PASOS PARA VOLAR - one of the absolute best films has two birds trapped in a house. Films like this is why going to NYICFF is a must

FISH RIVER ANTHOLOGY what if Stephen Sondheim wrote music like Stepehen King? Dead fish sing in a creepy ghoulish and funny tale

ROGER IS AWAKE - another wicked Gleeful Beast tale about a man waing up from a medical procedure which made a gruesome discovery. Another attempt by NYICFF to kill me via laughter

UNDERGROUND a wicked little film that has a glorious denouncement about what is going on after being buried alive

DOLORES a creepy nightmare of a film that has a little girl enter a field of corn and meeting two evil mummies. You will never see armadillos the same again.

A CAPTURED LOOSE-LEAF STEVEN this Gleeful Beasts chilled the audience, It kind of funny but truly disturbing.

LONG JOURNEY- This is a mostly good film about a boy being sent on a scavenger hunt by his mom. Its a great film until the denouncement which completely changes the mood.

Park (Taman-taman) (2024) First Look 2025


Asri and Hasan meet after work in the park and discuss life and things as the sun goes down.

This film shouldn't work as well as it does. It's a film that is basic a series of long static shots from a good distance away from the film's subjects, but it is so perfectly done the film puts us in the park where we are over hearing a long conversation or series of conversations between two people. We are there just listening to to people discuss life in a film that, for most of it's running time feels like life.(only when the film shifts to the lighted booth does it feel contrived).

The film is a blending of fact and fiction. I would be hard pressed to know what is or isn't real. Yes the set up is essentially fake, but at the same time I couldn't tell you where the lines between fact and fiction are. I was fully focused on the screen the whole time because the discussion was more than just eavsdropping. 

While this may not work for you if you need constant motion on screen, this film is recommended for anyone who wants good discussions.

Young Hearts (2024) opens Friday


YOUNG HEARTS is going to become a classic. It is a sweet and loving film about two 14 year old boys who fall in love and the complications brings. It’s a film that had me screaming “WILL YOU JUST KISS HIM” at the end.

I don’t know what to say, except I was bowled over by this film. Because the film is playing at the Berlin Film Festival I expected a heavy film with serious overtones instead of a straight forward film about confusion about a boy’s first love that just happens to be with another boy.  I wasn’t expecting a film that matter of factly dealt with the confusion that someone has, not only with someone of your own gender, but also with love in general. It’s a film that I could relate to even though I’m a straight guy.

And that is what makes this film so special, it’s not slanted entirely toward being a gay story. This is a film about being a person and having friends and family and how a first love resets your table. It’s not a film about orientation but falling for someone you really like. It’s one of the very few times where a film like this where the film isn’t slanted to be gay, but rather simply focused on the character  as a person. What I love is that the film never feels like it’s trying to make a point or be anything other than be a romance where we could lose ourselves in it – hence my yelling at the scream to kiss him and applauding when it happened.

Beautifully done both behind the camera and in front of it, this is a film that is just glorious. It is one of the best romances that I’ve seen in the last decade.

I absolutely loved this film a great deal.

Highly recommended.

The Legend of Ochi (2025) NYICFF 2025

An ADDENDUM before we start:

This piece has gone through several drafts each one stripping  away the discussion and leaving just a list of grievences, making me wonder if I should have posted this for Festivus. It wasn't unintentional it was something that just happened.  The reason it happened was that I have been trying to explain my feeling for this film and it's gone from a simple "I like it but it's a mess" to more iterations until now where I realize that I am angrily disappointed in this film - almost everything works - I mean it looks great, the cast is there, the creatures are awesome- but the script is so lacking in characters and reasoning that the narrative thread snaps from the first instant- we are never told anything that gives us a backstory of what is happening or why; nor do we get real characters but line drawings (I won't insult the notion of sketches).  There is a sense that the director knows it all (this could have been a 5-hour film) but he just doesn't show it or thinks that his target audience of six-year-olds will never notice. And the fact that so much seems to be missing pisses me off because this should have been a truly awesome film that lived in my heart forever and instead it's become a piece of junk I want desperately to break apart so that someone will rescue the tale and tell it the right way, with real reasons and real characters that aren't lazily drawn to the point none of them make sense. I want the film that the pieces promise not this broken doll with its limbs and head chopped off. I should not have had to spend 100 plus minutes spending each one asking about why and what and how. I should have drifted off on the story. And because this film doesn't explain anything-internally nothing makes sense - I am left with not so much a review but an abbreviated list of questions about things I should never have noticed.

I apologize but this film broke my heart (I mean look at the Ochi they are so damn cool)

THE REVIEW

Ever since I saw THE LEGEND OF OCHI at NYICFF my friends were asking what I thought of the film.  I wasn't sure what to say. Should I tell them how good the film looks? Or should I talk about the grand operatic score? Or should I tell them the creatures are very well done.?

Did I say any of that? No.What I said was simply "It's a mess"

I don't care that the director said he made the film for kids, the film makes no sense.

The film takes place on the island of Carpathia which is in the Black Sea. The island is shared by a group of people and some big blue creatures called ochi which occassionally kill the live stock and the people. The people, lead by Willem Dafoe, hunt the ochi. WHen Dafoe's daughter finds a small ochi she decides to  return it to its family.  This doesn't sit well with he father assumes she has been kidnapped and wih his band of lost boys goes to find rescue her.

I don't know where to start but while the film looks great the rest of the film really is a mess.

I don't know if the script was as much of a mess as the film is, but I sure hope not. Nothing in the film is explained or hangs together. I have no impressions of the film,  I only just an endless list of a questions and plot problems. Raymond Chandler said that an audience will forgive one, perhaps two unexplained turns (one of the shootings in THE BIG SLEEP is never explained), but more than that you will lose the audience. OCHI is full of unexplained turns and questions requiring answers. Here is a brief list of some of them:

- Is this a serious film or comedy? Willem Dafoe is so far over the top and his delivery is so out there I didn't now if I was supposed to be laughing or not. It seems like a comedy but no one was laughing.

-There is no real back story. We are told the monsters and the people are on the island and they don't get along, but there is no effort to explain what exactly happened. This leaves us with no idea why is Dafoe is such a homicidal nut job.

-There is no explanation of the monsters. NONE.  The bits we know- that they live in the woods... er caves on the island and hunt live stock makes no sense.  They are animals, until they aren't.

-There is no character development. NONE. We have no idea who anyone is. We kind of have a vague sense of the three leads were a family, but beyond that we have nothing. This is especially interesting since the band of boys who hunt with Dafoe are given prominence on the poster, but all we now is that they cast offs from families and orphans. We know nothing  about any of them except that one of them speaks with a Brooklyn accent (his only line). (And why does their look make them seem more like thugs/ fascists  then kids?)

- A terrium of catepillars? With no top and no sense that they will be butterflies?

-Everyone speas with a different accent, and language. Dafoe speas like himself, Helena Hengel speaks with a scandanavian accent and Emily Watson speaks with an accent from Mars. One boy sounds like he is from Brooklyn. The music played on the radio is in a variety of different languages. The guy who has his car stolen speaks in a Slavic language.

-Emily Watson knows all this information about the ochi, but we don't now how. She allegedly taught her daughter words of the ochi, but we don't know anything. She know where they live but she never saw the paintings in the cave. She ran after her daughter... and brought her flute?

- When the daughter the daughter realizes she can speak ochi the film is subtitled...just for that one scene.

- Why does travel across the island takes however along it requires the plot.

-We have no sense of anyone on the island other then Dafoe and the related characters. There is no sense of the society living there even though we see them. Why did they send their kids to Dafoe? What about school? 

-There is no reason that Dafoe goes from a psychotic Peter Pan to loving father.

-Why does one of Dafoes boys break into the house and trash the place when they are just there to see if the daughter is there? (There is a whole line of questioning here about the society where this happens, why they can misbehave and why they cross the line from being thugs to being de facto fascist soldiers)

- What is the deal with the Petro character? One minute he's good soldier, the next he's kind of sweet on the daughter and the next he's being a bad guy again...until he's not. This just highlights that no one arcs and no event naturally happens things just happen because the director says so.

There is more, much more. Almost every moment in the film will have you asking questions. I took pages and pages of notes much to amusement of the people sitting a couple of seats down the row.

This film feels like it was a thousand-page novel and it was cut to a fraction of that length.

Weirdly the film kind of works (as long as you don't think about it). The reason is the score which does all the heavy lifting by cueing us to what we are supposed to feel. The film is so cliched in construction and the score works so well that even if you have noticed all the missing material the end still will make you weepy- why? Because the score fixlls in all the holes.

Is it a bad film? Objectively, oh yea. The narrative just doesn't work. But emotionally... it kind of does at least enough that if you can let the music carry you to where you are five years old and don't know about plot holes.

Ultimately this film pisses me off more than any film has in the last year or so. Why? Because so much of the film works, the visuals, the music, the creatures... that the complete failure of the script to work  is a freaking shame. Had it worked it would have been an instant classic, instead its a major disappointment... a disappoint will even hit the film's five year old fans once they are old enough to ask questions.