For the record I have read Hellblazer, the source of this film, and I do like the comic.
Also for the record I do like this movie a great deal as well.
Is it the comic? Thats open to debate. I think in many ways it it is. I think the problem is that they've made a film about a very complex character who's been developed over hundreds of issues and distilled him down to what a mass audience could take in.(remember this is a character that runs in DC's alternative, non "mainstream" Vertigo comic line) No, he's not English, its not set in London, and its not always night and raining, but other than that I think they have the feel. Keanu for my money is pretty good. I think the problem for most people who read the comic is he's not a snarky Brit and therefore its not Constantine. I think he's fine and his performance takes other bits of his personality and brings them to the forefront. Its no different than the way different writers have handled the character over the years.
As a movie its a very good. Its not high art and its not Silence of the Lambs scary, but its a really good thriller with neat visuals and a creepy attitude. Any movie that can keep me up and awake until almost two in the morning when going in I could barely keep my eyes open, has to be a very good film.
I must single several of the supporting cast, Tilda Swinton as Gabriel and Peter Stormare as Satan. Both give great performances, though Storemare's devil who desperately wants Constantine's soul is flesh crawling evil at its finest. Talk about evil incarnate.
The plot has to do with the "re-discovery" of the Spear of Destiny, the attempt of the son of Satan to take over the world, and the investigation of the supposed suicide of an LA detectives twin sister. Its not giving anything away to say they are all related nor that there intertwining forms a pretty dark path.
This is a really good movie thats worth seeing if you're into ghoulies and ghosties and things that bump in the night.
A collection of reviews of films from off the beaten path; a travel guide for those who love the cinematic world and want more than the mainstream releases.
Saturday, January 18, 2014
Friday, January 17, 2014
A few words on Ana Arabia (2013) New York Jewish Film Festival 2014
A single take film follows a journalist as she talks to the family and friends of a Holocaust survivor who married a Muslim in Israel. As the people talk we get a sense of the Arab Israeli conflict on a personal level.
I'm mixed on this film.
Had this film been a stage play this would have been a kickass theatrical experience. On stage the talky nature of the tale would work to it's advantage. Sadly on film are much too static. While the camera moves around a group of buildings to put us in different locations, each time people start to talk the camera stops moving and we are essentially watching people speak while in a tableau. It might have worked if there was a rhyme or reason to the order of the conversations,but there doesn't seem to be one. There doesn't seem to be a reason for the journalist to keep going back and forth to the various people. Two people offer to make her tea, she says yes but then walks off to talk to someone else.
The big selling point of the film is single take of the film. Why is the single take so important? If no one had pointed it out (The film itself even mentions that it was done in one take) I never would have known or cared. But by making a big deal about the one take I kept waiting for the reason for it. There had to be a reason to do it in one take right? Apparently not.
Personally I could have missed this film.
New York Children's Film Festival has quietly revealed some titles....
Owing to the Oscar nomination for Ernest and Celestine I stumbled on some of the titles for this year’s New York International Film Festival. Other than Amazonia which is the opening night film I don’t know when any are playing.
Here’s the list:
Opening Night Film: Amazonia (US Premiere)
Aunt Hilda (North American Premiere) – From the director of Cat in Paris, Mia and Magoo, Raining Cats and Frogs
Boy and the World (US Premiere)- this looks way cool:
Ernest & Celestine (Theatrical Premiere, English-language Version) Oscar nominee... Do I have to repeat myself and say go see this?
Foosball 3D (New York Premiere) This is highly rated on IMDB
Muppets Most Wanted (Showcase Screening)
Rio2
Most are playing about the same time that they premiere elsewhere in the world so you’ll be among the first to see them.
More titles are to be revealed very soon.
Tickets are officially on sale February 3- but I’ll let you know if I discover they’re on sale sooner.(Yes I do stalk their website until tickets go on sale)
Riders to the Stars (1954)
Ivan Tors made a series of fantastical science fiction films in the 1950's all of which were rooted in the science of the times. He had mad MAGNETIC MONSTER in 1953 about a strange element that threatened to destroy the world in the hopes of creating a series of science based detective films but it went no where. He also made GOG which was a 3D thriller about robots in a secret base going amuck when taken over by enemy agents. In between the two he made RIDER TO THE STARS about sending men into space in order to capture meteors to be used for shielding in rocket ships.
I'm not going to lie to you,I found this film a snooze fest. It's not bad as such but so dry and lacking in real motion that I'm wondering if the film wouldn't have been better cut down to an hour (or half hour) and released as a B film. I know you're wondering if I'm that down on the film why I'm including it and it's simply that until recently I somehow never ran across it. As some one who love 50's science fiction films its odd that I never noticed the film before, but having seen the film I understand why no one ever seemed to run the film. (I'm also using it to bridge our typical good films into next weeks annual round up of film turkeys)
To be honest the film is pretty good to start. It has a great cast of B film stalwarts Richard Carlson (who directed), Herbert Marshall. William Lundigan, James Best and many others.the set up of a rocket crashing to earth and the men and women behind it trying to deduce who to keep them save is good. Also good is the way the men are recruited. Of course it's silly but at the same time it adds an aire of cloak and dagger. The final rocket flight is also exciting.
The trouble is the middle section once the men get to the base and begin training. Its a bit loopy (at one point a shrink sits in with the men who are left in a room to try and work out who is suitable) and a bit by rote (the centrifuge sequence). While I freely admit that time has moved past this film, I still would rather see something like the kind of similar DESTINATION MOON simply because the drama isn't dull.
Worth a look for science fiction completeist, others may want to stay away.
I'm not going to lie to you,I found this film a snooze fest. It's not bad as such but so dry and lacking in real motion that I'm wondering if the film wouldn't have been better cut down to an hour (or half hour) and released as a B film. I know you're wondering if I'm that down on the film why I'm including it and it's simply that until recently I somehow never ran across it. As some one who love 50's science fiction films its odd that I never noticed the film before, but having seen the film I understand why no one ever seemed to run the film. (I'm also using it to bridge our typical good films into next weeks annual round up of film turkeys)
To be honest the film is pretty good to start. It has a great cast of B film stalwarts Richard Carlson (who directed), Herbert Marshall. William Lundigan, James Best and many others.the set up of a rocket crashing to earth and the men and women behind it trying to deduce who to keep them save is good. Also good is the way the men are recruited. Of course it's silly but at the same time it adds an aire of cloak and dagger. The final rocket flight is also exciting.
The trouble is the middle section once the men get to the base and begin training. Its a bit loopy (at one point a shrink sits in with the men who are left in a room to try and work out who is suitable) and a bit by rote (the centrifuge sequence). While I freely admit that time has moved past this film, I still would rather see something like the kind of similar DESTINATION MOON simply because the drama isn't dull.
Worth a look for science fiction completeist, others may want to stay away.
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Children of men and women in Kore-eda's LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON (そして父になる)
LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON (そして父になる), a hit at Cannes and recently seen making a strong showing at this year’s New York Film Festival, finds impressively consistent (consistently impressive?) director Kore-eda Hidekazu tackling another impossibly complex situation. Children are again at the forefront of the plot. But unlike his feature debut だれもしらない (Nobody Knows), here lies a great deal of ambiguity in how we should feel about the situation before us.
At the core of the story is a switched at birth scenario, which finds the Nonomiya’s faced with the shocking news that their 6 year old son, Ryosuke, is not the child they gave birth to. Their biological son has ended up with the Sakai family. And vice versa. The two families are faced with the harrowing task of deciding how to proceed. A hospital official’s advice that nearly 100% of the families that faced the same situation chose the same option – to exchange the children – make their course of action no less difficult.
Early on, the film is laden with subtly suggestive imagery: a twisting conch shell of a highway, a spiraling stairway of the exclusive private school where Nonomiya Ryota and his wife hope to enroll the child they’ve been raising. These speak of the convoluted path that lay ahead.
Kore-eda takes an already emotionally charged situation and crafts it into something fascinating, in equal turns humorous and tense, by making the two central couples polar opposites in almost every sense. There is a lot of mischief afoot concerning their vastly different cultural and socioeconomic standpoints. The Nonomiya‘s live a neat and contained existence, their high-rise apartment almost literally an ivory tower. The Sakai clan is a ramshackle storm of chaos in comparison. Their sprawling home is overrun by Ryusei and two siblings, and serves as a base for at least 2 independent businesses ventures. The Nonomiya‘s uptown modesty clashes with the Sakai‘s prideful boast of their family name, which happens to be emblazoned on their home and van.
The most significant difference lies with the families’ respective patriarchs; the stoic and nearly impossible to satisfy Ryota, whose constant campaign against mediocrity is the source of a growing rift with his wife, and the Sakai family’s Yudai, an unrepentant slacker portrayed mirthfully by artist/actor Lilly Franky. Essentially they are the perfect foils for one another.
Yet just as we become comfortable with the predictable and true to life quirks of these characters, leave it to Kore-eda to pull out a quick turn of the tables that takes us by surprise. Like when Yudai‘s lighthearted jesting and frugality turns to white hot indignation at a slight to his child rearing values hinted at by Ryota.
Most of the dramatic tension arises from the Nonomiya’s. Not one to lose, Ryota seriously contemplates the possibility of taking both children. Meanwhile growing feelings of loneliness and isolation within his wife, Midori, make the idea of losing Ryosuke that much more unbearable. It makes for an interesting statement on the potential gap between achievement of status and true happiness. In a sense, speaking to the importance of community, voices of reason always appear to temper drastic behavior, be it from the hardworking, level headed Sakai Yukari – another counterbalance to her daydreamer husband Yudai, or Ryota’s somewhat estranged mother, or the switched children themselves.
What may be deemed by some as a slow ride is in fact an amazingly human balancing act of conflict and achieving harmony. The couples’ ability to collude in a trial run of separating from the children they have raised, having each child stay with their respective biological parents on weekends, is admirable, even as internal rifts and frustrations chip away at their resolve. Rather than wallow in despair, LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON feels like a testament to resourcefulness and the ability to adapt, as the challenges of family are offset by the capacity for new relations to be sources of comfort, even in the face of the most challenging trials.
Kore-eda’s understated ambition is in top form, allowing him to explore both social issues particular to Japan and more universal human issues, without making a garish show of it. In fact a case can be made that Kore-eda is among the world’s greatest advocates of children as he continues to cast them in a respectful light without a hint of belittling or condescension. They appear as little adults, forced to adapt to the complex and often scary world left to them by older generations, and showing amazing resiliency in doing so. His depiction of their perspective is perhaps his most amazing gift of insight. Even a simple momentary detail, such as Ryosuke‘s wide eyed expression in the dark of his room while his parents argue right outside, is enough to speak volumes.
LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON opens this Friday, January 17, in New York City at the IFC Center
Me on twitter = @mondocurry
The Twonky (1953)
Arch Obler is best know for his Lights Out radio show which, if you're a Bill Cosby fan, was the source of one of his best routines, the one about listening to a horror story about a giant chicken heart. Yes the show was real as is the story about the chicken heart and it is rather creepy because Obler was a master story teller.
Obler not only wrote radio shows he was a filmmaker as well. If you want to blame anyone for 3D movies blame Obler who made BWANA DEVIL which single handedly kicked off the 3D boom in the 1950's.
The year after kicking off 3D Obler made THE TWONKY a scathing satire and an attack on television which was changing society in ways he didn't like.
The plot of the film has Hans Conried's wife going off on trip and in order to keep him company she buys him a TV. Unfortunately for Conried something has taken over the set and it is intent on regulating every moment of Conried's life.
At best an okay film, the humor is not particularly good and in retrospect the film has dated thanks to people stealing outright or coming to similar conclusions over the years since it was made.
I know my saying this makes you wonder why I would write the film up for Unseen, and the answer comes from the fact that Obler's assault on TV from 1953 is still valid some sixty years on, only more so. Once you had to be at home to watch TV and you only had a handful of stations. Now you've got thousands of choices and if you have a smart phone the TV is always with you- there is no escape. It's very freaky to watch some of what goes down in this film and realize Obler was predicting things 60 years ago.
Why am I writing the film up? Because Obler's warnings about TV should be heeded even if we haven't been listening for 60 years.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
The Strange Case of Wilhelm Reich (2012) New York Jewish Film Festival 2014
The life and trials of Wilhelm Reich who ran afoul of the US government with his search for the fundamentals of life. While the government said that he was violating various laws from the FDA they were largely unhappy with his life style and his beliefs which clashed with the teaching or orthodox psychiatry. Told in a series of flashbacks as Reich seeks to defend himself from violating injunctions set against him by the FDA.
I'm going to be honest and say I'm not sure what I think of the film. As a biography of the man it's not a bad film, however as an exploration of his thoughts and ideas I'm kind of less happy with it. For me the problem is that watching the film I'm less sure of what I knew about Reich and his work then I was going into the film. Yes we are told about Orgone and the accumulators and other things in his work but much of it didn't seem to connect up. What are they exactly? I'm not sure- at least as far as the film is concerned which means as far as what the threat he posed to the US government.
What confuses me is that it's not really a bad film, but it's not a good film, its a film that sort of is. Its it's own unique little thing, which I suppose is a good thing, but at the same time I don't know if you need to pay for it. You'll forgive the lack of clarity in this review but to be honest I have no idea what to say.
Witching Hour (1934)
People actually took this film seriously?
Amazing.
This wild tale has a young man in love with the daughter of a rich gambler. When the gambler hypnotizes his future son in law he unconsciously puts the suggestion in his head that he should kill a certain rival. When its realized what has happened-the young man has no memory of the killing-the hunt is on to find an attorney who will defend him and make a jury believe what has happened.
Based on a play that played for 212 performances several decades before it was turned into a film Witching Hour is the sort of film they don't make any more for good reason- it would be laughed off the screen. At the same time when seen as a film from long ago it's entertaining.
I doubt that you'll buy any of this, from the gambler's ESP to the ghostly appearance of our hero's grandmother to how the case is won, it's all faniciful speculation and contrivance- and yet you'll keep watching. Why? because it's so wonderfully out there you'll have to see how it all is going to come together.
Wacky doesn't begin to describe it.
Its a great deal of fun and should you run across it give it a look.
Amazing.
This wild tale has a young man in love with the daughter of a rich gambler. When the gambler hypnotizes his future son in law he unconsciously puts the suggestion in his head that he should kill a certain rival. When its realized what has happened-the young man has no memory of the killing-the hunt is on to find an attorney who will defend him and make a jury believe what has happened.
Based on a play that played for 212 performances several decades before it was turned into a film Witching Hour is the sort of film they don't make any more for good reason- it would be laughed off the screen. At the same time when seen as a film from long ago it's entertaining.
I doubt that you'll buy any of this, from the gambler's ESP to the ghostly appearance of our hero's grandmother to how the case is won, it's all faniciful speculation and contrivance- and yet you'll keep watching. Why? because it's so wonderfully out there you'll have to see how it all is going to come together.
Wacky doesn't begin to describe it.
Its a great deal of fun and should you run across it give it a look.
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
Dark Mirror (1946)
Olivia deHavilland stars in a dual role as twins suspected of murder. Actually one of them is suspected but the question is which one? Lew Ayres is brought in to try and figure that out for cop Thomas Mitchell.
This film kind of caught me by surprise. in the process of doing some cleaning I needed something to watch so I reached into a pile DVDs from All Clues and No Solutions and pulled this out not knowing what it was. Putting it in it started and I didn't think much of it, and then after about five minutes I was hooked and the time cleaning became less and less and the time watching became more and more.
Hitting pretty much every psychological/good twin Bad twin cliche the film none the less remains entertaining thanks to the performances, deHavilland has rarely been better, and a script which keeps things twisting. When one of the twins who eyes a pair of shears late in the film a chill will go up your spine as you worry if the good doctor is going to take it in the back.
This is a solid little thriller that is more the sort of film that you'd expect to come from a B studio, but it's been gussied up by a major studio and given an A level shine.
Definitely one to keep an eye out for.
This film kind of caught me by surprise. in the process of doing some cleaning I needed something to watch so I reached into a pile DVDs from All Clues and No Solutions and pulled this out not knowing what it was. Putting it in it started and I didn't think much of it, and then after about five minutes I was hooked and the time cleaning became less and less and the time watching became more and more.
Hitting pretty much every psychological/good twin Bad twin cliche the film none the less remains entertaining thanks to the performances, deHavilland has rarely been better, and a script which keeps things twisting. When one of the twins who eyes a pair of shears late in the film a chill will go up your spine as you worry if the good doctor is going to take it in the back.
This is a solid little thriller that is more the sort of film that you'd expect to come from a B studio, but it's been gussied up by a major studio and given an A level shine.
Definitely one to keep an eye out for.
Monday, January 13, 2014
DEN (2001)
A serial killer, with a
religious secret, captures four victims and plays a deadly game of Q
& A. The winner is promised to come out alive from this 'wreck' room
where truth, sin and religious faith are the
game of choice.
Does this sound a tad familiar perhaps? Maybe you've heard of something similar? A certain film (turned franchise) about a madman who after abducting his victims forces them to play twisted games for their own survival. No the above synopsis is not taken from any of the SAW films, it is from the rarely seen 2001 independent film DEN. A project that predates SAW by three years.
Does this sound a tad familiar perhaps? Maybe you've heard of something similar? A certain film (turned franchise) about a madman who after abducting his victims forces them to play twisted games for their own survival. No the above synopsis is not taken from any of the SAW films, it is from the rarely seen 2001 independent film DEN. A project that predates SAW by three years.
From 2001 through 2002 DEN was heavily playing the
film festival circuit, one being the NYC Horror Film Festival, which
I've covered in the past. Another being the Melbourne Underground Film
Festival in Melbourne, Australia. Now here is
where thing's get interesting.
James Wan & Leigh Whannell, the writers/creators of the SAW
franchise, met each other while attending film school in Australia.
Whannell being from Melbourne, Wan originating
from Malaysia. What remains in question is the timeline of such things.
Though it does seem very plausible that both Wan & Whannell were
students at the time that Arce's film was shown in Melbourne.
Arce: "We played at the Melbourne festival in July of 2002. My lead actress won a best actress award at that festival. So I know that we were known there. I have never been able to prove that those two guys were there, but just backing up the history seemed to me they were probably film students there or had recently graduated and what film student doesn't go to the film festival in their area. I tried getting help from the Melbourne Festival but they declined."
I asked Greg about when he first heard about this project named SAW that was being shopped around, and his reaction after he saw it.
"I guess I first heard about SAW sometime in either late 2003 or early 2004. I started getting emails from people that had seen DEN years before and saying that had just seen a film that was similar to mine. I believe SAW had played at some film festival. At that moment I didn't know what to think."
"It wasn't until SAW
actually came out that I made the connection. The weird thing is I liked
SAW and even liked the sequel... didn't think much of all the other
ones after that. I was hated in the SAW community
because they felt I was some guy just trying to make a paycheck off of
them."
Shortly after SAW opened during
Halloween week of 2004, is when I first learned about the comparison.
Despite my annual attendance at the aforementioned NYC Horror Film Fest, I
somehow missed out on DEN's
screening back in 2002. I honestly didn't think anything of it at the
time, until someone at the festival was talking about SAW and how it ripped off this previous film. This piqued my interest immediately, and
quite frankly bummed me out for passing on it years earlier. Besides, I was not even a fan of SAW.
But I am fascinated when I hear a story like this one.
Speaking of which...
I'd be hard-pressed to
not at least mention the more known The Last Broadcast & The Blair
Witch Project controversy. A debate that still goes on to this day,
even though the similarities between those two films is
undeniable. It does need to be noted, the director of The Last
Broadcast never proceeded with legal actions. For what reason, I am not
sure. The Blair Witch Project went on to become one of the most
successful horror films of all time. Meanwhile, The Last
Broadcast remains an unknown title to general audiences.
Back to DEN, in what seems like years it took me to finally come across a copy of it. Why so long? Well the film was never officially released. Between trying to find distribution and lawyer-legal fees, Arce filled for bankruptcy. For now, his film only exists in cyberspace.
Back to DEN, in what seems like years it took me to finally come across a copy of it. Why so long? Well the film was never officially released. Between trying to find distribution and lawyer-legal fees, Arce filled for bankruptcy. For now, his film only exists in cyberspace.
"I ended up going through several lawyers (either 4 or 5) and never got anything out of it. They would always start out positive and tell me it's a slam dunk case, but then suddenly decide it was not for them. Some people started to tell me they felt that maybe the lawyers were being paid by the SAW film companies, but I have no proof and I'm never a conspiracy theorist."
"So I ended up being broke and the SAW franchise made something like a half a billion dollars. And all I kept saying to the lawyers is I would have been happy to have at least been compensated for the cost of doing DEN... which was around $150,000... all my money from selling my home. Just to have been put back to square one would have meant a lot to me and I'm sure I would have gone on to make another film. Oh well."
After now having
seen both movies, it’s clear where the films are connected. Certain
scenes are so blatantly obvious, a blind man see it! It would be one
thing for me to rattle off some facts but
I had to inquire from Greg, in his own words, what are the major
similarities between his film and SAW. Not only did he have an answer
for that, but he made points that I completely missed.
The following is the list that Greg had sent to me:
1.) The main story
of SAW has two men tied to chains who wake up in a strange place… In DEN
the captives also wake up in a strange place and are tied in chains.
2.) The main story
is set in a rundown bathroom with pipes running all around it… In DEN,
the whole story takes place in an abandoned theater that has walls &
pipes that appear similar at times
to that of SAW’s.
3.) In DEN, one of the main captives is a psychotherapist and in SAW the main guy is a doctor.
4.) In DEN, the
psychotherapist as a secret that he has cheated on his wife… In SAW the
doctor’s secret has to do with infidelity.
5.) In DEN, the killer picks people that have hidden secrets that are connected to each other… same thing in SAW.
6.) In DEN, the killer picks people he believes have some immoral secrets or past…. Same is true of the killer in SAW.
7.) In DEN, killer plays psychological games that pits each captive against each other… same is true in SAW.
8.) In DEN, the killer tries to make the captives make decisions that will require someone else to die… same is true in SAW.
9.) There is a key
scene in SAW where the killer says, “Make a choice” and this line is
used in the trailer… we have a similar scene in DEN with the same line
repeated over and over.
10.) We have a tub of water next to one of our captives in DEN… in SAW there is a bathtub next to one of the captives.
11.) The opening
scene in SAW when the captives wake up is very similar to DEN’s where
they are asking each other where they are & what is this situation
all about.
12.) Both films have scenes showing how the captives were picked up by the killer.
13.) In SAW, one of the characters talks about himself as being on a “leash” due to the chain… we have the same speech in DEN.
“By the way,
there was one thing on the following list that was not added back then. I
actually realized this years later. I guess you know that the big
secret in SAW is that the killer is
the shot dead guy in the middle of the room. He suddenly stands up in
the end. I completely forgot that we have similar scene like that in
DEN. It's not supposed to be a big twist, but just a kind of dramatic
moment. In DEN, the heroine gets hold of gun and
shoots DEN in the middle of the room. He falls down dead. Everyone
thinks that's it and then he suddenly gets up. It's kind of similar in
tone.”
Arce has since moved on from all the controversy. As far as my thoughts on DEN, honestly it’s a good film. Maybe it’s missing the production value of SAW and having name actors, but who cares. It is well written, acted, and certainly kept my interest throughout.
So that’s that. Did SAW rip off DEN? Did James Wan & Leigh Whannell steal from Greg Arce? I'm not an expert, however the numerous similarities make it very unlikely that this could all be just a coincidence. Check out this side by side comparison of the poster for DEN and the doll from SAW. I rest my case.
Rambling about the trippy Footprints on the Moon (1975)
Strange head case film about a woman haunted by visions of a government experiment involving stranding people on the moon She herself seems to have have been working on projects involving mind control. As the she tries to both run down the source of her visions and escape them we are left to ponder what is and isn't real.
Sorry about that less than perfect explanation of the plot but once you see the film you'll know that even if I told you everything that happens how you interpret it will be up to you. This is not an idle statement rather it's a statement of fact owing to how the end of the film kind of takes the rug out from under you and makes you wonder whats really going on. To be honest its a feeling that is running rampant through out the film as characters behave in the most strange way.
How is it as entertainment? Beats the crap out of me. To be perfectly honest I have no idea if I like it or not. I know that this shouldn't have been something I was watching after midnight, but it was. I also know that the film, good bad or indifferent, is something I'm going to revisit. I need to see this again in order to try and make some sort of sense as to what was going on. If I'm not sure what I think other than I need to see it again, you're probably wondering why am I writing the film up, simple, because the film has been hanging with me for a couple of days since I saw it.
This is one is worth at least trying (the film is streaming on Amazon and can be has from All Clues No Solutions as well as other places.). I should also warn you that the running time is listed as running any where from 80 something minutes to almost two hours with most prints running just over 90. Not sure what is the directors preferred one.
Sorry about that less than perfect explanation of the plot but once you see the film you'll know that even if I told you everything that happens how you interpret it will be up to you. This is not an idle statement rather it's a statement of fact owing to how the end of the film kind of takes the rug out from under you and makes you wonder whats really going on. To be honest its a feeling that is running rampant through out the film as characters behave in the most strange way.
How is it as entertainment? Beats the crap out of me. To be perfectly honest I have no idea if I like it or not. I know that this shouldn't have been something I was watching after midnight, but it was. I also know that the film, good bad or indifferent, is something I'm going to revisit. I need to see this again in order to try and make some sort of sense as to what was going on. If I'm not sure what I think other than I need to see it again, you're probably wondering why am I writing the film up, simple, because the film has been hanging with me for a couple of days since I saw it.
This is one is worth at least trying (the film is streaming on Amazon and can be has from All Clues No Solutions as well as other places.). I should also warn you that the running time is listed as running any where from 80 something minutes to almost two hours with most prints running just over 90. Not sure what is the directors preferred one.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Nightcap 1/12/14- Under the weather and under a church
This week was a mixed bag in a lot of ways and so this first nightcap of 2014 is as well.
Tuesday I went with Hubert to see Ethan Hawke do Macbeth on Broadway. It was hailed in many corners as a disaster, but while the show was messy and a weird collection of styles in look and performing, the show actually cam together in the end to be something special. What I liked in particular was the witches played by Byron Jennings, Malcolm Gets and John Glover who took a much active role in the proceedings by drifting in and out through the action and even taking over some roles as if they were actually pushing Macbeth off the cliff. For my money it was a good night at the theater and one that gave me clues as to how I would stage/film the show if I ever got the chance.
I have been pretty much sick since Wednesday night. Stomach problems became more and I spent much of Thursday and Friday asleep. While I had been joking with friends that what I needed was a couple of days with the flu to catch up on some DVDs, what I got was general unconsciousness and listlessness. The most taxing thing I could handle was DVDs of Celebrity Bowling. I did try to watch several things but most things ended up putting me to sleep. I did make it through CINERAMA HOLIDAY which was quite good and a review is coming, I also saw some more films from the Jewish Film Festival- those pieces will run this week.
Managed to drag myself out of bed to go to Basilica of St Patrick’s Old Cathedral in New York and I managed to see one of the creepiest things I've ever seen in the catacombs under the church. I posted pictures on our Tumblr page
I also watched some episodes of a 1966 TV series called Hippodrome which ran for 11 weeks. The show was a collection of circus acts with celebrity ringmasters. Tony Randal did a few, Merv Griffin, and Woody Allen. Yea Woody Allen shows up to introduce acts and box a kangaroo (you can find the Kangaroo sequence on You Tube). Timeless Home Video put out 9 of the 11 shows out on DVD and if you can get them cheaply enough (I've seen the set as cheap as 6 bucks) it worth a look- however be warned they are trimmed of some musical sequences because of rights issues (or so I've read)
Hopefully I'll be feeling better and in the swing of things this week with the free movies at Tribeca Cinemas starting up again Tuesday, an 80's movie marathon next Saturday and a few other things.
As always we get Randi's link collection....
Wong Kar Wai and Martin Scorsese
Life of Brian Debate
Movie script downloads
Film Noir on line
Lowest gross of 2013
Wedgies kill
If you haven't seen it the Simpson's Miyazaki tribute
Joseph Plateau’s Amazing Phenakistoscope
Last Days of Cinerama
Star Wars Crawl Creator
This weeks films are titles I discovered through All Clues No Solutions
The Nance
Some of the best news I’ve heard recently was that the Broadway show The Nance had been filmed and was going to be run on PBS sometime in the next TV season.
I had seen the show during its run and my reaction was to state that it was not only great but it also restored my faith in theater. What I meant by that last statement was that as lapsed frequent theater goer my desire to go to the theater was killed by too many big budget movie retread musicals, Family dramas that are essentially the same or the theatrical equivalent to inde mumblecore films. There are more complicated reasons, not to mention the fact that the cost of going has shot out of control, but for the most part I’ve stopped going to the theater because I stopped being entertained or entranced or made to feel anything.
The Nance entertained me, It entranced me, it moved me.
The story of the Nance is that of Nathan Lane’s burlesque comedian. He is a gay man who makes his living playing a highly effeminate character type known as a Nance. As the film opens Lan is drifting into a relationship with a young man who has just arrived in the city. As his personal life is improving, dark clouds are on the horizon professionally. The city is looking to close down the burlesque theaters because they are dens of iniquity (hookers plied their trade in many of them) and anything off color or not normal (hints of homosexual characters) are targets.
What transpires is the show.
What transpires is theatrical magic and look into humanity that had been lacking in most recent Broadway shows.
I loved it on every level. It’s a joy to behold, even as it breaks your heart.
Nathan Lane is a revelation. Don’t get me wrong I love Lane, but having seen him on stage any number of times I find that unless he loves a role he walks throw his performances. He not only is capable of phoning it in, but phoning it I from three states away. With the Nance Lane is spot on and real. You can tell he loves the role and it means something and so he invests it with something from every fiber of his body If you’ve ever wanted to know why Lane is often considered one of the greatest actors working today- look no further.
I love that the show shows us Burlesque for what it was. I love that it shows us classic routines that started there and ended up in the movies.
Mostly I love the shows heart. I love that even though its about Burlesque and a gay man, it also is a human story that could work transplanted elsewhere. This is the story about not only finding love, but also what we will do if people tell us that we can't do what we love to do. Yes this is a story based on what happened in New York in the 30's but at the same time its a story with bigger implications for all of us.
I absolutely loved this play a great deal. I know when it was done all I could think was that it had to be made into a movie. Its too good a story not to be seen by as many people as possible. Thankfully it has been recorded and will be broadcast in the New Year.
Maybe the play that restored my faith in theater can restore my faith in TV as well.
See The Nance when it plays on PBS.
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Carry on Sargeant
As a bunch of new recruits comes in a drill sergeant bets his comrades that he will produce the top platoon before he retires in ten weeks time. Unfortunately for him he ends up saddled with a grand bunch of losers who are probably drive him in sane well before he ever retires.
This is the first of the Carry On films, the long running series of low brow British comedies that poke fun at everyone and everything. Most of the jokes are secondary to the plot, or rather the plot is simply an excuse to move the cast from one gag set up to the next, and really isn't important.
I had never knowingly watched a Carry On film until I sat down and watched this film. I'm not sure if thats a good thing or a bad thing. Certainly the cast is game, its lead by William Hartnell as the Sergeant of the title. Hartnell is best known as the first Dr Who, and he made a career out of playing this sort of part. He is joined by a stalwart cast of British comedians,who are all expert at what they do, which is produce a great many laughs (I have no idea who any of them are even though all of their faces are very familiar from other films and TV shows.)
I'm torn about the film. Taken as a series of set pieces this is a screamingly funny movie. The jokes are the sort that are not only laugh out loud funny, but will make you laugh so hard that you'll go light headed. On the basis of the jokes its easy to understand why this film spawned 31 films, several TV specials and stage shows. Unfortunately as a movie, with a plot this film is the pits. Its awful. None of it really hangs together as the numerous character plot lines cross and recross to very little effect. It almost sinks the movie since the good stuff clashes badly with the bad stuff.Still I haven't laughed this hard in a good while, which makes rating this movie difficult.
If you're a fan of British comedy its worth a look. Its also worth a look if you like military humor or don't mind a comedy that has a a bad plot line, but very funny jokes. Rent it or borrow it, but don't buy it (at least until you've seen it an know if you like it).
This is the first of the Carry On films, the long running series of low brow British comedies that poke fun at everyone and everything. Most of the jokes are secondary to the plot, or rather the plot is simply an excuse to move the cast from one gag set up to the next, and really isn't important.
I had never knowingly watched a Carry On film until I sat down and watched this film. I'm not sure if thats a good thing or a bad thing. Certainly the cast is game, its lead by William Hartnell as the Sergeant of the title. Hartnell is best known as the first Dr Who, and he made a career out of playing this sort of part. He is joined by a stalwart cast of British comedians,who are all expert at what they do, which is produce a great many laughs (I have no idea who any of them are even though all of their faces are very familiar from other films and TV shows.)
I'm torn about the film. Taken as a series of set pieces this is a screamingly funny movie. The jokes are the sort that are not only laugh out loud funny, but will make you laugh so hard that you'll go light headed. On the basis of the jokes its easy to understand why this film spawned 31 films, several TV specials and stage shows. Unfortunately as a movie, with a plot this film is the pits. Its awful. None of it really hangs together as the numerous character plot lines cross and recross to very little effect. It almost sinks the movie since the good stuff clashes badly with the bad stuff.Still I haven't laughed this hard in a good while, which makes rating this movie difficult.
If you're a fan of British comedy its worth a look. Its also worth a look if you like military humor or don't mind a comedy that has a a bad plot line, but very funny jokes. Rent it or borrow it, but don't buy it (at least until you've seen it an know if you like it).
Friday, January 10, 2014
The Jewish Cardinal (2012) New York Jewish Film festival
Excellent look at Jean-Marie Lustiger who was born Jewish and became a cardinal in the Catholic Church. He had converted to Catholicism in 1940 in order to keep him safe from the Nazis. It kept him safe but it caused splits within his family (his father couldn’t see how he could become a priest) and within himself (he still considered himself Jewish despite following in Christ’s footsteps)
Beginning just before he finds out that he has been made a Bishop and taking him to his death in 2007 this is a moving portrait of a man just trying to find his place in the world and his path to God. It’s a path filled with road blocks, confusion and uncertainty as he has to struggle with what he feels is right, what the church tells him is right and how the world perceives him to be.
Made for French television the film isn’t a huge epic story but a small scale story of one man on the road. Its a story that is firmly focused on Lustiger and his inner conflict. That the film works so well is do wholly to Laurent Lucas as Lustiger. He manages to sell the character/the man much better than many of the other actors playing other high ranking Church officials. He manages to let us in on both the humor and the conflict in the man. He allows us to see his choices and reflect upon them. As good as Lucas is some of the others seem to be walking through their roles with Aurélien Recoing as Pope John Paul coming off as weird and in one or two scenes as if he were aping Roberto Benigni.
This is a super little film. I really liked it. It was so good that when it was done I ended up much too late reading on the life of Lustiger on line. For me what set sets the film apart is that it isn’t really about being Jewish or Catholic or both, but its about finding one’s self spiritually, it’s the reflection of the journey that makes this a great film since it’s a journey that we all, to some degree make.
This is one of the best films at the Jewish Film Festival. This is definitely worth seeing when it plays tomorrow afternoon, the 14th and the 20th
New York Jewish Film Festival Capsules : BEFORE THE REVOLUTION, UKRAINE BRIDES 13 YEARS LATER, THE WOMEN PIONEERS and RITA JAHAN FOURZ
More Capsule reviews.
Before the Revolution (2013)
Dan Shadur and Barak Heymann's film on Israeli's in Iran before the Islamic revolution is a must see. The now seemingly way out story of how the Shah and Israel once were friendly is hard to imagine. Its the story of how many went to Iran to make some big money only to fail to realize the trouble that was brewing around them.
Like the best documentaries this absolute gem of a film shows us something we never knew and does so in such away that it alters everything you thought you knew.
This is possibly my first big Wow of 2014.
The film plays on January 20th and 21 and is worth getting you butt down to Lincoln Center to see it.
Ukraine Brides:13 years Later (2013)
Director Nili Tal looks in on the lives of some Ukrainian women who married Israeli men in a kind of mail order bride situation. Tal had first encountered them in 2000 and then stopped in to visit them several times over the years. This is the latest installment and its film that provokes a wide range of emotions from smiles to tears.
I really like the film a great deal however I kind of wish I had been following the stories all along since there were several times I sensed that there was stuff I missed by not seeing what had gone before. That said this is a super little film that's playing on January 22nd and is worth your time.
The Women Pioneers (2013)
Portrait of the some Eastern European women who in the early part of the last century traveled to Palestine to build a new life and "create a new woman". Using archival footage and excerpts of the letters and diaries of the film explores the difficult lives the women chose to lead. An earnest and heart felt film, it didn't particularly connect with me. I know its the result of the film seeming to be a bit too somber for my tastes.
It plays January 21
Rita Jahan Fourz (2013)
Companion piece of sorts to Before the Revolution (see above) about singer Fourz who left Iran when she was a child and moved to Israel. Convinced to record an album in Farsi we watch as Fourz records the album and interacts with her family. A wonderfully messy film that bounces from feeling professional, a home movie, a family drama to making of documentary to concert film, this film is strangely alive in a way that many other films aren't. To be certain some pieces don't work, but others kind of transcend the moment and become something wonderful. While I did not walk out loving the film I did like it enough to start looking up on line for some of Fourz's music.
This film plays January 16 and 19
For tickets and more information on any of the films go to the FilmLinc website here.
Before the Revolution (2013)
Dan Shadur and Barak Heymann's film on Israeli's in Iran before the Islamic revolution is a must see. The now seemingly way out story of how the Shah and Israel once were friendly is hard to imagine. Its the story of how many went to Iran to make some big money only to fail to realize the trouble that was brewing around them.
Like the best documentaries this absolute gem of a film shows us something we never knew and does so in such away that it alters everything you thought you knew.
This is possibly my first big Wow of 2014.
The film plays on January 20th and 21 and is worth getting you butt down to Lincoln Center to see it.
Ukraine Brides:13 years Later (2013)
Director Nili Tal looks in on the lives of some Ukrainian women who married Israeli men in a kind of mail order bride situation. Tal had first encountered them in 2000 and then stopped in to visit them several times over the years. This is the latest installment and its film that provokes a wide range of emotions from smiles to tears.
I really like the film a great deal however I kind of wish I had been following the stories all along since there were several times I sensed that there was stuff I missed by not seeing what had gone before. That said this is a super little film that's playing on January 22nd and is worth your time.
The Women Pioneers (2013)
Portrait of the some Eastern European women who in the early part of the last century traveled to Palestine to build a new life and "create a new woman". Using archival footage and excerpts of the letters and diaries of the film explores the difficult lives the women chose to lead. An earnest and heart felt film, it didn't particularly connect with me. I know its the result of the film seeming to be a bit too somber for my tastes.
It plays January 21
Rita Jahan Fourz (2013)
Companion piece of sorts to Before the Revolution (see above) about singer Fourz who left Iran when she was a child and moved to Israel. Convinced to record an album in Farsi we watch as Fourz records the album and interacts with her family. A wonderfully messy film that bounces from feeling professional, a home movie, a family drama to making of documentary to concert film, this film is strangely alive in a way that many other films aren't. To be certain some pieces don't work, but others kind of transcend the moment and become something wonderful. While I did not walk out loving the film I did like it enough to start looking up on line for some of Fourz's music.
This film plays January 16 and 19
For tickets and more information on any of the films go to the FilmLinc website here.
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Otelo Burning (2011)
True story of several friends who found escape from Apartheid in surfing. Unfortunately while thre is hope the evil spectre of the foul institution that separated black from white is lurking.
Wonderful film is exactly the sort of thing that Unseen Films was set up to highlight. This is a small scale gem of a film. This is the sort of a film that will play better the less you know about the twists and turns of the plot
The thing that I love about this film is that it all feels real. Watching the film you get this wonderful sense that you are watching events transpire right before you. This is due in no small part to the ensemble cast of actors who seem to be living the story instead of acting it. The performances are so good you wonder why more actors can't be this natural.
This is a wonderful little film and you really should make some effort to try and see it.
OTELO BURNING makes its digital premiere on January 14, 2014 on iTunes, Amazon Instant Video, Microsoft Xbox, Sony Entertainment Network, SundanceNOW, VUDU and YouTube. The film is available for pre-order through Sundance Institute’s Now Playing page, as a result of the partnership between Sundance Institute and IFP, who release several of their alumni films a year through this collaboration.
The Congress (2013) The New York Jewish Film Festival 2014
It's all in your head- repeated refrain in The Congress
Let me be up front about this, you will either be madly in love with this film or running to the exits. The screening I attended had some people people leaving once things got really weird and others such myself leaning forward trying to suck in every frame and word into our brains.
The next thing I should say is I'm not sure if this is the last best film of 2013 or the first best film of 2014. Either way it's one of the best films I've seen in some year.
Loosely based on a novel by Stanislaw Lem the man who wrote the source novel for the Solaris films (Andre Tarkovsky's and Steven Soderbergh's) the film follows Robin Wright who plays a version of herself. She is offered a deal from a movie studio a 20 year deal to use her likeness. They will pay her a large fortune and then scan her so they can use her likeness anyway they want (with some restrictions) but she will never be able to act again. She takes the deal. 20 years later she's called back to renegotiate the deal at the time of the Futurist Congress...that's when things get animated-literally.
I'm not going to lie,this film has problems. The film takes a while to get going and then once it comes gloriously to life, it leaps 20 years into the future and has to get traction all over again. The film also suffers from a plot line and logic that sometimes comes and goes- which is annoying but keeping with the It's all in your head refrain that we hear repeated-since this film is all in someone's head.
Personally I forgave the bumps and burps, but some people left the screening shaking their head unsure of what they were seeing.
The styles of the animation are said to be based on those from the Fleischer Studios (Betty Boop, Popeye amongst others) but there are wild riffs on animators such as Ralph Bakshi, Rintaro and his Metropolis and Satoshi Kon and his Paprika, not to mention comic and fine art steals. There are riffs on various films (Dr Strangelove being the most obvious) and movie stars. I also see literary references including Michael Moorcocks Dancers at the End of Time and it's changing reality. The film is full of references and I can't wait until some one annotates the whole film.
For me the brilliance of the film comes from two places. First the film places you in a world of its own devising and it makes you believe its real. Yes its drug induced animation but something about the set up makes it all real. Some how I really think I could buy that this sort of insanity would be possible.
The other place the film scores heavily is in all of the ideas it has floating around in it's demented little mind. Not only does it rip apart the entertainment industry but it examines the cult of self, the nature of reality (its all in your head), drugs, how we perceive each other (I don't want you to see me as I really am), the notion of love(I've loved you since I started animating you), story telling and I don't know what else. Joyously once we get animated ideas and thoughts and notions keep getting thrown at us. So much came my way that I thought I was drowning. There are simply too many ideas floating around in the film.
This is a film that needs to be seen multiple times before it can really be discussed. I stopped taking notes at a certain point. I had to, there simply was no way to write and process what I was seeing. More so I began to catch things in the later part of the film that referenced stuff from the beginning. Had I seen this on DVD or Bluray I would of gone back and checked the reference, but I couldn't do so.It was me and the film and one go through.
I should mention that there is so much visual information in the film you'll want to see the film as big as possible simply to have some sort of chance to catch everything that is going on.
Good god what a glorious mess. I would gladly sit through a flawed film such as this that touched my head and my heart and was carried with me out of the theater to the point where it colored the whole world after seeing it then sit through a super slick damn near perfect film from mainstream Hollywood. When the film ended and I hit daylight I started calling and texting friends to go see this film.
What a way to start a new year (or end an old one).
If you are willing to see something special, something far far from typical give The Congress a try. You may not love it like me, but I would be willing to take a white out pill to bet that you'll come out feeling you've seen something truly special.
I'm not going to lie,this film has problems. The film takes a while to get going and then once it comes gloriously to life, it leaps 20 years into the future and has to get traction all over again. The film also suffers from a plot line and logic that sometimes comes and goes- which is annoying but keeping with the It's all in your head refrain that we hear repeated-since this film is all in someone's head.
Personally I forgave the bumps and burps, but some people left the screening shaking their head unsure of what they were seeing.
The styles of the animation are said to be based on those from the Fleischer Studios (Betty Boop, Popeye amongst others) but there are wild riffs on animators such as Ralph Bakshi, Rintaro and his Metropolis and Satoshi Kon and his Paprika, not to mention comic and fine art steals. There are riffs on various films (Dr Strangelove being the most obvious) and movie stars. I also see literary references including Michael Moorcocks Dancers at the End of Time and it's changing reality. The film is full of references and I can't wait until some one annotates the whole film.
For me the brilliance of the film comes from two places. First the film places you in a world of its own devising and it makes you believe its real. Yes its drug induced animation but something about the set up makes it all real. Some how I really think I could buy that this sort of insanity would be possible.
The other place the film scores heavily is in all of the ideas it has floating around in it's demented little mind. Not only does it rip apart the entertainment industry but it examines the cult of self, the nature of reality (its all in your head), drugs, how we perceive each other (I don't want you to see me as I really am), the notion of love(I've loved you since I started animating you), story telling and I don't know what else. Joyously once we get animated ideas and thoughts and notions keep getting thrown at us. So much came my way that I thought I was drowning. There are simply too many ideas floating around in the film.
This is a film that needs to be seen multiple times before it can really be discussed. I stopped taking notes at a certain point. I had to, there simply was no way to write and process what I was seeing. More so I began to catch things in the later part of the film that referenced stuff from the beginning. Had I seen this on DVD or Bluray I would of gone back and checked the reference, but I couldn't do so.It was me and the film and one go through.
I should mention that there is so much visual information in the film you'll want to see the film as big as possible simply to have some sort of chance to catch everything that is going on.
Good god what a glorious mess. I would gladly sit through a flawed film such as this that touched my head and my heart and was carried with me out of the theater to the point where it colored the whole world after seeing it then sit through a super slick damn near perfect film from mainstream Hollywood. When the film ended and I hit daylight I started calling and texting friends to go see this film.
What a way to start a new year (or end an old one).
If you are willing to see something special, something far far from typical give The Congress a try. You may not love it like me, but I would be willing to take a white out pill to bet that you'll come out feeling you've seen something truly special.
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Lorcan Finnegan's Foxes (2012) is incredible
FOXES - short film from LORCAN FINNEGAN on Vimeo.
I picked this as one of the best films of 2012 and it's a must see. Do yourself a favor and go to Vimeo and play it full screen- trust me.
Here's my Tribeca 2012 review:
FOXES
I want to really talk about this film, but I don't dare. I don't want to ruin it for you. This is a film of mood and of surprise that you just need to see. These hair raising 15 minutes are best experienced rather than wrecked by careless words.
This is a chilling short film from Ireland about a couple living all alone in a lonely row of houses. She becomes obsessed with the foxes that wander the neighborhood. Where her obsession goes is the story, and it will mess with your head. Seriously this is an eerie film of the highest order. The end sent a genuine chill through my body.
Put it on the list of best films of any length at Tribeca and possibly of the year. Absolute proof that great things come in small packages.
New York Jewish Film Festival 2014 Capsule Reviews REGINA, WHEN JEWS WERE FUNNY, LONELY PLANET, ZIGZAG KID and AMY WINEHOUSE THE DAY SHE CAME TO DINGLE
While I've seen many of the films at the New York Jewish Film Festival some of the films have defied my efforts to turn in full reviews. To that end I present some capsule reviews:
Regina (2013)
Hour long portrait of Regina Jonas (1902-1944) the first female rabbi in the world. The film is a very good portrait of a specific time and place and a person I never knew existed. One has to admire her drive to do what she felt was God's work. My sole complaint film about the film is that there is too much slow motion imagery which I know was used to evoke a time gone by but what it does is simply slows the film way down do that it feels much longer than it's 63 minutes. Worth a look.
Plays January 13 and 15
When Jews Were Funny (2013)
Alan Zweig's discussion about the influence of Jewish comedians in popular culture. Full of interviews and clips of comedians over the last several decades the film is frequently funny.
Unfortunately the film suffers in two areas. First if you have any sort of interest in the history of comedy you probably know most of the history here. Yes, there are are new stories and jokes but odds are you know most of this already.
The other problem is that director Zweig makes some major missteps. First he isn't a good interviewer, asking frequently obvious questions or questions that just lie there or get non-answers (I don't have an answer for that or I don't know what you're asking me is a frequent refrain). At other times his subject berates him for not listening to what they are saying. Personally I wanted to smack him.
A funny film but I'd wait for TV.
Plays January 9
Lonely Planet (2011)
A documentary crew investigates the story of Mishka Zilberstein who spent three years living with wolves during the Second World War.
Strange blending of fact and fiction is the sort of film you either buy into or you don't. Gorgeous real life images of traveling through along the Trans Siberian Railway mix with sequences that are staged. It plays like a weird found footage film where some sequences are very much head scratchers or knowingly obtuse. Its a kind of absurdist documentary.
To be honest 20 minutes in I was done and tuned out much of the rest of the film. While I was enjoying the scenery the staged material left me cold. For whatever reason I simply couldn't click with the film. The mixing of real and stage material just didn't work for me.
I have no idea what your reaction will be but I suggest proceeding with caution.
Plays January 9
Amy Winehouse: The Day She Came to Dingle (2012)
BBC Arena documentary about when Amy Winehouse went to Dingle in Ireland to record an episode of the The Other Voices TV series.Wonderful portrait of not only a singer and her music but also the village of Dingle. I don't know what to say other than if you are a fan of the late Ms Winehouse you owe it to yourself to see this short documentary (it runs an hour)
It plays January 14 and 15
Zigzag Kid (2012)
Amusing family film about a young boy who is being trained by his police inspector father to follow in his footsteps. When he’s sent away by his dad on the eve of his bar mitzvah he soon finds himself on the trail of a mystery which will impact his life. Better than most recent American family films of the last few years this romp is a great way to spend an afternoon at the movies. Might I suggest January 12 when this plays?
Regina (2013)
Hour long portrait of Regina Jonas (1902-1944) the first female rabbi in the world. The film is a very good portrait of a specific time and place and a person I never knew existed. One has to admire her drive to do what she felt was God's work. My sole complaint film about the film is that there is too much slow motion imagery which I know was used to evoke a time gone by but what it does is simply slows the film way down do that it feels much longer than it's 63 minutes. Worth a look.
Plays January 13 and 15
When Jews Were Funny (2013)
Alan Zweig's discussion about the influence of Jewish comedians in popular culture. Full of interviews and clips of comedians over the last several decades the film is frequently funny.
Unfortunately the film suffers in two areas. First if you have any sort of interest in the history of comedy you probably know most of the history here. Yes, there are are new stories and jokes but odds are you know most of this already.
The other problem is that director Zweig makes some major missteps. First he isn't a good interviewer, asking frequently obvious questions or questions that just lie there or get non-answers (I don't have an answer for that or I don't know what you're asking me is a frequent refrain). At other times his subject berates him for not listening to what they are saying. Personally I wanted to smack him.
A funny film but I'd wait for TV.
Plays January 9
Lonely Planet (2011)
A documentary crew investigates the story of Mishka Zilberstein who spent three years living with wolves during the Second World War.
Strange blending of fact and fiction is the sort of film you either buy into or you don't. Gorgeous real life images of traveling through along the Trans Siberian Railway mix with sequences that are staged. It plays like a weird found footage film where some sequences are very much head scratchers or knowingly obtuse. Its a kind of absurdist documentary.
To be honest 20 minutes in I was done and tuned out much of the rest of the film. While I was enjoying the scenery the staged material left me cold. For whatever reason I simply couldn't click with the film. The mixing of real and stage material just didn't work for me.
I have no idea what your reaction will be but I suggest proceeding with caution.
Plays January 9
Amy Winehouse: The Day She Came to Dingle (2012)
BBC Arena documentary about when Amy Winehouse went to Dingle in Ireland to record an episode of the The Other Voices TV series.Wonderful portrait of not only a singer and her music but also the village of Dingle. I don't know what to say other than if you are a fan of the late Ms Winehouse you owe it to yourself to see this short documentary (it runs an hour)
It plays January 14 and 15
Zigzag Kid (2012)
Amusing family film about a young boy who is being trained by his police inspector father to follow in his footsteps. When he’s sent away by his dad on the eve of his bar mitzvah he soon finds himself on the trail of a mystery which will impact his life. Better than most recent American family films of the last few years this romp is a great way to spend an afternoon at the movies. Might I suggest January 12 when this plays?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



























