Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Supergirl (2026)


"Celebrating" her 23rd birthday, but in reality, hiding from the universe by staying on a planet with a red sun and getting drunk, Kara, aka Supergirl, ends up having to travel across the universe to find the antidote to the poison that was injected into Krypto by a band of brigands. The brigands were in the process of stealing Kara's spaceship when Krypto tried to stop them. Traveling with Ruthye, the daughter of a sword maker killed by the brigands, she has three days to save her dog.

SUPERGIRL is not the mess that many internet pundits and supposed gate keepers have declared it. I am not going to lie and say its a perfect film, it is not, but I think the issue here is not so much the script as the fact that this feels like it was trimmed down from a longer better film. I say this because repeatedly there were times where I got the sense that something was left out. It's the sort of left out you get when you trim bits that add context not because the script was broken at the start. I believe this more because the sequences that feel whole and the construction of the story, especially in the inclusion of Lobo, feels right.

I want to say at the top that this not going to be a film that disappears, despite what the gatekeepers and misogynistic film bros may want to happen. I think that this film is going to grow in stature over time. Having had the film live rent free in my head since I saw it Saturday, I am of the opinion that it is much better than we all think. I think we will see this once we all step away from what we thought the film was going to be and take it for what it is- something greater and more important than the disposable reel of celluloid that the pundits and hateful film bros have labeled it.

But I'm getting a head of myself.

The day after SUPERGIRL opened I bought a ticket and took a ride. The theater was largely empty- owing to the fact that the film at 1030 am was in three or four other theaters at the multiplex. The audience was largely girls and their families. That was not what I expected but it made me smile. I honesdtly I expected an audience of male comics geeks, but they apparently all skipped my screening.

The opening sequence where the brigands come and kill Ruthye's family is really clunky. It's borderline bad  and I feared that the script was as bad as everyone seemed to be saying. Fortunately it was not.

From there the film shifts to Kara and the film picks up. 

Okay Milly Alcock-IS Supergirl. She kicks ass. Its a performance for the ages. It's one of the truly great superhero performances that just gets better and better as we get more shading as the film goes. Seriously she is one of the truly great broken but functioning characters I've seen in cinema, never mind superhero cinema. By the time we get her final encounter with Krem and the final scene you get this glorious (and Oscar worthy) emotional journey. There is no way Oscar will not notice it, but audiences will. The little kids who don't feel they belong and feel utterly crushed by life will notice it and they will embrace it and they will absolutely take it to heart and carry it with them as proof that they can go on. Cinema should not just reflect what is, or entertain, but it should give hope as much as possible. Alcock gives hope and I'm guessing millions of kids and adults will connect to that.

The misogynistic fan boys and those delighting in crushing the film should be wary since this film is very much an attack on them. The film is about an all-male society who kidnap and use women only for breeding being crushed by two women. It's a film about women standing up for themselves and making their world a better place. This is ultimately a film that was made for girls and outsiders who feel put down and put upon. This wasn't made for the self-important male film community. This film is a ultimately a female empowerment film that is closer to real than a film like Barbie- because Kara is closer to every person sitting in the theater and not a self-assured young woman who can't fail. Kara can and does and yet goes on. The failing and then getting up is what gives the film its resonance and power.

And before you yell at me about Lobo, yea Lobo is there. Yes, Jason Mamoa is great as Lobo, but he never outshines the ladies. Yes, Lobo is there. Yes, Lobo helps Kara and Ruthye, but he is never the focus, nor the only reason the ladies succeed. In the film Lobo is referred to as a god. He's really not that, but within the context of the film he is. Lobo is essential a deus ex machina- a machine of god. He comes in and nudges things. He helps when it suits him, he makes a suggestion to Ruthye about how to escape and then he leaves -and even then, she exceeds what he thought she would do. All of the work is done by the women. Lobo is little more than a necessary plot device.

I should say something about the violence- it's brutal and ugly- and while it isn't bloody it is graphic. People are impaled and broken apart. People die, badly. It is very much a PG-13 film. In its way it's disturbing. Actually, the violence and the evilness of the brigands are light years beyond almost any other superhero film, particularly a DC superhero film. 

I have heard a number of writers complain it's a bad shift from the world of last year's SUPERMAN. Well, the truth is it isn't that film, nor is it set on earth but on a meaner nastier and uglier place. It's not a reinvention of that world, or of the superhero genre, but simply a look at that world from a different perspective, perhaps from the shadows. This is not SUPERMAN and it is not trying to copy that film. You can't kick the film for not repeating what went before, especially since many who said that would have kicked it for repeating. (Think of it as Urasawa's Pluto compared to Tezuka's Astroboy)

Critics and audiences have to remember the films we see are not our films- but the work of artists and even when we critique them, we have to remember that we didn't make the films and they were never made to match our sensibility unless by happy accident.

That said the film does have problems....

The problem with the script is largely that there is a sense that something is missing. Yes, we have enough to carry the plot forward, however at the same time shading seems to be missing. I kept thinking I should know more, particularly about the brigands who are little more than standard, but incredibly evil, bad guys. And it's not that I need long exposition, rather I would have liked just some sort of odd line that added color rather than their entire being being summed up by their name- brigands. I mean we know more about the tech pirates who attack the space bus for one brief sequences than the brigands who are the big bads for a two hour film.

On the other hand, mostly the script nails it where it has to. Lobo is largely in the background. The plot moves and is cathartic. Most importantly the script is written so that all of the emotion shades almost all of the characters. Kara is a wholly formed woman. You feel her pain. When Ruthye finally unloads on Kara you feel the weight in her words. You especially feel the weight when Ruthye tries to rally Kara with words that echo those of Kara's mother. Most amazingly the film radically shifts our understanding of Clark/Superman, explaining why he is so good. Its something that explains a great deal and ultimately gives Kara a much bigger emotional standing when you realize what it takes for her to be good considering how she sees the world.

I should also point out that despite the jokes the film is very heavy. There is a weight to what happens. As I said above, people die and die badly. There is a cost, if not physically then psychically, for everything. This is not a Marvel movie where anything can happen, no one is ever really dead, and the world is shiny happy bunny farts. The world of SUPERGIRL is dark and ugly and painful. There is poverty everywhere. The worlds all look the same because most of what we see is shit holes. Almost all of the people in this film are barely surviving, and they are being abused by bottom feeders. It is not what people want from superhero films (think all the big spectacle of Marvel's output) and I think that is why people have not warmed to it... then again, the film actually isn't a superhero film,  it's a coming-of-age film. This isn't an action film but a character centric drama about two women fighting to find a way out of the darkness.

When this film clicks and is firing on all cylinders, it is one of the best superhero films ever made...

The trouble is it feels like a half an hour was chopped from this. What was the original cut of this film like? I would love to find out.

If there is anything really wrong with the film it's that the needle drops, pretty much every damned one of them is awful. I honestly cannot defend any of them. Needle drops should set the mood from the first notes; we shouldn't have to wait to hear several lines of lyrics to know what the song is saying and why they are using it to score a big scene. Nor should you use a cover version of a perfect song with the wrong tempo. Only that final cover is remotely right - but it's the absolute wrong version. And no, I am not saying this because I don't know the songs used as needle drops, it is because the songs chosen are just sonically emotionally wrong. I know if we swapped out every needle drop for something else everyone's opinion of the film would go up.

Should you see SUPERGIRL?

Yes. It's a solid action film. I don't think you need to run out to see it in IMAX theaters but do see it, just see it when you can.

What makes me happy is that ultimately, despite the shouting about the box office it won't matter. Kids, and I do mean kids, are going to find the film and it will be a hit, a cult hit but  still a hit. It will save lives and give hope to the kids who discover it and need to hear its message that despite the pain that they too can be heroes, that they can be snarky and funny and not stand down so long as they are doing good. This film will, in the long run, change lives.

How do I know?

Because I saw young girls delighted by what they were seeing on screen. I saw them smiling at watching a girl kicking the ass of all the guys. I saw one little girl running though the theater dressed as Supergirl with a look of complete and utter joy on her face because she saw that she could do that...girls could be the hero.

I know that people go to films dressed as the characters be it Star Wars, Marvel, or Michael Jackson or something else, but this was the first time that I saw the world change as a bunch of kids saw a future open up. It wasn't so much they will be Supergirl (or Luke or Spidey), but it was kids realizing life hurts but they can fight through it and be something wonderful- hell Kara only wears the suit in the final minutes of the film - it is only put on when she chooses to be more than just Kara and become Supergirl. Looking in the eyes of the little girls, I saw them realize that they could be that.  SUPERGIRL is vital and important and one of the great films of 2026 because it will give girls, and anyone else who find it, the ability to go on and be good despite the pain.

As I write this I have no idea how the film did at the box office, but I do know how it will do long term. Short term it maybe a bust(or not) but in terms of the long term this film is going to rattle the pillars of heaven.

Monday, June 29, 2026

THE SINKING OF THE LISBON MARU (2024) hits VOD 6/30


In October 1942, an unmarked Japanese ship was targeted and torpedoed by an American submarine who didn't know that the ship was transporting British POWs. What followed was fight for survival as the men in the sinking ship tried to escape, the Japanese tried to keep them in and the Chinese fisherman on the nearby Donji Island tried to save as many people as possible even though it could cost them their lives.

The story of the sinking & rescue was told last year in a film called THE DONJI RESCUE which was changed to THE RESCUE AT DONJI for VOD release in the US. The earlier film haunted me so much that when this film crossed my inbox I had to see it.

Not to put dance around the matter Fang Li's film is a masterpiece. Its a film that crosses time and moves us with the story of what happened back in 1942, while making us misty with the realization that effects of war bleed off the battlefield and down generations.

What I love about the film is that Li manages to juggle multiple story lines and never lose them. We have Li's quest to find out what really happened in 1942 as well as his effort to find the wreck of the ship. We have the events of the sinking. Most importantly we have the stories of the families of them men on the ship and of the fishermen who stepped up to do the right thing. Some of the men didn't survive and some did, but their experiences effected the lives of their children and grandchildren. I was moved multiple times over.

In all my years of watching war related documentaries I've never seen a film that covered so much and did so so perfectly. Truthfully this is the first time where you realize that war doesn't just effect the lives of the people involved in the conflict, but everyone that comes after. It was a point that really hit home when the film ended and everyone was saying their goodbyes.

I can not really explain how good this film is. I might be able to do that down the road, once I've seen it a few more times.

Until then do yourself a favor and see this film when it hits VOD on June 30.

Last Ryde (2026)


A suicidal ride share driver ends up driving a sick man with two days to live

This is a film that doesn’t do anything new narratively, however the film scores because the cast take their assignments seriously and they create characters we want to hang out with because the make them people.

I’m not going to lie and say this film is going to rock the pillars of heaven, it’s not, but it is going to entertain you. Watching the film after 100+ films from Tribeca I wanted to go off the board and see something that I wasn‘t being yelled at by a PR firm to review ASAP. I just wanted something I could watch and get lost in. I got lost in THE LAST RYDE for the better part of two hours and forgot the world. That may not sound like the be all and end all of a review, but the truth is it’s the small films like this that are the best sort of ones to watch. Away from expectations it’s the films like this that we can just be and relax and let the people on screen make us smile for a while.

Is this high art? No but you a couple of hours you’ll forget the BS of the world and be.

Worth a look for the curious. 

Souvenir (2026) Dances With Films 2026


Two friends who are meeting for the first time in years have a rough reunion. However before they can part, they find a lost wallet and make an effort to find the person.

I love most of this film. The central thread of of the two friends talking is spectacular. I know there have been a number of these films recently, some better than others. This is, for the most part one of the best. Its worth your time to search this out.

Just be aware that the filmmakers didn't fully trust the story and the characters and they added some flourishes that didn't need to be there.

Forgive the distractions and just see this film.

Sunday, June 28, 2026

Tribeca 2026 - Tales from the Road

 

AMC 19th Street

Tribeca is done. 

I'm not sure how many films we saw but it's a lot- my rough count is 142 different titles but I saw a couple of films multiple times.

We reviewed everything we saw with the exception of two films - THE WEDDING ENTERTAINER because the red carpet nonesense, and he other was KILLING CASTRO  which was so fake I walked out because I didn't want to end the festival seeing a film I was going to rip to shreads.

What follows are some thoughts I had during the festival in more or less chronological order.

-----

Going into the fest there was a lot of negativity. A number of people who write on film were wondering why I covered so much when the fest was hit or miss. A lot of my real world friends were wondering why I bother because I don't get paid to do this. It had me in a bad mood until I saw some friends and the first great film.

----

I discovered this butter brioche muffin at a place near the AMC 19th street. I tend not to be a muffin person. I was intrigued. I went from this is okay to suddenly going this is wonderful in a couple of seconds

introducing playing potus from very far away

-----

Walking around the area before the first screening I was trying to orient myself.

Sadly there had been alot of change with a number of my favorite places to get food or just hang out and shop gone.

----

I met Benedict Wong a couple of times. He was a juror. He was a gentleman and put wup with me being amazed.

----

The worst part of Tribeca this year was Bill Lustig wasn't there or if he was I completely missed him. 

Every year, for the past 5 or 6, Bill and I would talk about what was playing, what was good, bad and indifferent. We'd talk about the spectrum of films and gave each other recommendations. 

I deeply missed talking movies with my Tribeca traveling companion.

----

I finally had someone come up to me because they recognized the bag.

Heading out to lunch on one of the first days Justine Brown passed me and stopped and and said "Hey I know that bag!"

Justine is a former EW writer and current college professor who has sent me some films for review. We had talked on line but had never met in person.

She rocks.

----

I ran into Monocurry and his family for the first time and ages.  We met up when we ended up at the premiere screening of BOB AND DAVE CLIMB MACHU PICHU.

Now the trick is going to meet up when we both can sit down and talk and not try to dance around Tribeca events.

Addendum- we are trying to work out Japan Cuts

----

There was a cranky writer who wandered the theaters in the early days trying to sort out where they wanted to sit in each theater. Once they sorted it out, they always took that seat in every other screening and got pissy when the seat was occupied if they arrived late.

----

I had breakfast with Liz Whittmore, and the world was okay for a morning

Bob Odenkirk and Amy Sedaris

----

This was the first festival where I was getting hate emails and tweets in real time. People took offense to what I said about some films.

It is nice to know that people are reading my stuff even if they are throwing brick bats.

----

There were a couple of films during the fest where there was some music with explicit lyric and some films that wanted to convince the world that all men were evil monsters made me think I was out of touch or too old to be doing this.... until I heard some good music that had explicit lyrics and saw some films that did more than just stand there and scream a position that I realized the problem was the films and not me.

----- 

PR people made me crazy.

Numerous ones refused to send me a screener because they wanted the films seen big and loud until they realized I really couldn't see the films on the big screen and then pleaded with me to watch their film during my non-existent free time away from the festival.

I also was not particularly happy with a few PR people pushing for coverage from Tic Tok or social media influencers until they realized that they weren't going to get coverage and they sent emails asking for coverage of things they originally said no to.

No offense I and my fellow writers are known quantities - you know if we say yes, we will get you coverage- why annoy the people who will definitely get word out there.


----

The festival felt less alive this year. Yes, the P&I screenings were better attended, I was never alone, However the excitement at the public screenings I attended wasn't really there this year.

----

I saw a lot of films I realized were good but just not for me.

Save and Amy and Bob and some guy

----

There was a weird rumor that flashed for one morning that said the festival was looking to do away with P&I screenings. It was talked about for one morning and then never mentioned again. I never ran down the source only that someone had said they were told they might go to all online coverage for press next year - which would limit coverage because many films were not on-line

---

There was a side discussion about baseball stadiums and someone suggested that if you wanted your kid to love baseball keep them away from Yankee Stadium because its serious and staid and not fun for kids like Citi field. Citi Field was a fun a place for kids (Addendum: when the Mets aren't dying)

----

I saw a lot of films that would have been better with something swapped out, cast or director or music

----

Watching the films it seemed that a growing number of filmmakers don't fully grasp how to edit their stories for maximum effect. They understand the craft of filmmaking but not the storytelling side with poor choices in how things move or in their shot choices.


----

I went into the Harry Potter Store on 22nd Street

I wish Rowling wasn't such a twit because I thought the store was a blast. It is a magical place.

Sadly I just won't do anything to knowingly put cash in her pockets.

----

I heard the Madonna screening at the fest was a nightmare with a mediocre film, a rambling speech and the refusal to allow anyone to take pictures. A couple of people sent to cover it said they couldn't because they made it impossible to do so.

----

I saw Disclosure Day and was mixed. My saying that on social media resulted in attacks that said I didn't understand Spielberg. I liked the engagement but think they should have waited to see the film before saying I got it wrong because several people crucifying me didn't like the film when they saw it.


----

No one seemed to be on the red carpet for the AI feature

----

I loved walking to the city when the Knicks game was on and hearing pockets of cheering as they scored.

----

I don't mind people talking before a film but I didn't need the kid explaining to the audience of TOY STORY 5 the other four films in detail including the deeper meaning (his own) of every scene.

----

I did  like the two critics dismantling DISCLOSURE DAY as if it were a doctoral thesis.

I don't think they were right top to bottom but it was facinating.

----

I disliked that the feeling that the festival was one long day. 

It was my fault since I was only home to sleep for a few hours, but it messed with my mind and I am still recovering.


----

I hope they get the AMC 19th street under better control next year. In one of the theaters, you could hear construction literally on the other side of the wall. In others the AC was so loud it drown the sound of the films.

----

I walked out of MUMFORD AND SONS HOUSE BAND, the next to last in person film I saw, and felt - that's it I can end here and be content.

At the same time I was seized by the feeling that either I or the festival may not be there next year.

----

Walking out of AMC 19th street that last time I knew it was time to go. I wanted to get pictures of my friends who are volunteers but it didn't happen. They were busy. 

The last film there was about choosing to do what you love over what you choose to make money. I just suddenly thought maybe my road to happy is somewhere else.

Leaving I knew it was time to go... and not just Tribeca but also possibly Unseen Films

There was something final about the feeling. I had this sense that I might be wrapping up Unseen.`I say that because as I walked out of the fest I knew I had nothing really slotted past my coverage of the fest. I simply didn't make plans past the end. The was nothing but old film reviews into February and I was completely okay with that.

Things did drop in- you all read the coverage of the last week-and there is coverage for the next week- but I still don't have much beyond that. Right now, I am only doing a couple of films at NYAFF and I have plans to do something with Fantasia but there is nothing cinema related tied to the site beyond that. (well I do have a package for NYFF)

I'm not sure where I stand - and that's okay- I suggest keep reading and see what happens. As I write this a week before it posts I have no clue.

Why am I telling you this?

Because this is a piece on the thoughts I had while at Tribeca and this being the end was one of those thoughts.

----

RANDOM QUOTES:

When you go into the bath you mind must be fresh, clear like lettuce - ZEJTUNE

If you ask for a $100,000 for a car a ban will say yes. If you ask for $100,000 for a tractor they will say no -HARVEST

I some how managed to escape (and most of these were just okay- they need a new programmer for this section)

Son of Sleepaway Camp aka Memorial Valley Massacre (1989)

 

Imagine renting a movie called Son of Sleepaway Camp, discovering it has nothing to do with Sleepaway Camp, and then learning it’s also an edited version of another film.

That’s essentially the story of Memorial Valley Massacre, a low-budget slasher that spends 92 minutes proving its alternate title is the most interesting thing about it.

This was common practice in ’80s and ‘90s horror cinema, most notably in Italy. Night Killer (1990) was retitled Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3. Shocking Dark (1989) was released as Terminator 2. Son of Sleepaway Camp is just another example of a distributor hoping a familiar title would do some heavy lifting.

The plot centers on a group of campers spending Memorial Day weekend in the woods while a feral hermit wages a one-man war against littering. More or less anyway. Take the destruction-of-nature themes from Avatar and add them to a Friday the 13th sequel. A unique premise? Sure. 


That doesn’t make it good. 

Even as someone who loves the slasher era, I found this one more tedious than entertaining. There are a few fun kills scattered throughout, but the pacing is far too sluggish. I suppose whatever enjoyment you’d get out of this depends on your patience. 

Ironically, it also features an obnoxious overgrown brat character who would fit right in with the cast of 2008’s Return to Sleepaway Camp. An entry so grating, I think I’m having a better time with this non-sequel.

As far as Sleepaway Camp goes, or its “son”… if you’ve seen the original Sleepaway Camp, then you’d know that’s not happening. Like, logically.


The title isn’t the only thing borrowed.
Son of Sleepaway Camp also lifts music directly from Sleepaway Camp, including its stinger theme. You can even hear snippets of dialogue from that film underneath the music, as if nobody bothered to separate the audio tracks first.

And if that wasn’t enough, add some out-of-place scenes of hardcore porn, and you got yourself the international cut of Memorial Valley Massacre. Congratulations.

The standard cut of the film is easily accessible to watch online. Or, if you’re a physical media collector, boutique label Vinegar Syndrome has released it on Blu-ray. I hear the picture quality is the best it’s ever looked.

As for me, I did indeed purchase an unofficial Son of Sleepaway Camp copy. A DVD sourced from VHS footage. Because a sucker is born every minute.

Sandy Fannies (2026) Tribeca 2026


A young woman goes to the sea side with her mom, hoping to be able to talk about some important subjects.

This is a sweet little film that unfortunately got lost in my Tribeca shuffle. A gentle gem of a film, SANDY FANNIES is exactly the sort of small film that needs the exposure of a festival screening but which should not be seen in a festival enviotment since it gets swallowed up by all the bigger and louder films around it.  I say that because Isaw this film on an afternoon when I was watching a lot of shorts for Tribeca and when I sat down to write the films up I kind of bumped over this title- which sucks because this film actually hung with me where the other louder films faded.

This is film you need to track down. Its  lovely film about trying to connect with the ones we love.

This is as good a film as I saw at Tribeca.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

Random thought-Tribeca and the AI problem

The only camera people covering the allAI feature at Tribeca

Tribeca has an AI (artificial intelligence) problem.

The last few years they had films pondering the place of AI in the world.  There was always one token doc. The first ones pondered what it was, the next few pondered if it was good and the latest bunch have largely been films that leaned into AI being okay. The only doc that they have run that was totally useless was the one last year which was one of the fathers of AI in which he said it was perfectly fine and anyone who didn't buy in was deluded because nothing bad will happen. It was such a pro AI film that it essentially said there was no down side and that it was better than puppies, Santa and peace on earth. 

This year the festival, in addition to playing a film whose title suggested that AI was probably okay, made a huge deal about showing the first epic feature film made entirely with AI.

The film writers lost their minds. Almost everyone stated they would not have anything to do with the film. A lfew of them said they would not cover the festival as a result.

I'm not a fan of AI. I hate that it learns on other people's work and then spits out a variation of what it learned. There is no creativity because to use it you have to give it parameters of what you want and it spits back something similar to what has gone before because it had to look at data and scrape it and copy it. 

What the festival doesn't realize is that Tribeca's embrace of AI fell flat because for a fest that pushes creativity and original storytelling in its programming as a big deal, an all AI film (based on what the technology can do right now) runs counter to its alleged principles. They want Tribeca to push creativity but AI just copies. You can't champion the new if you're using something that is just recreating the old.

The move to love AI despite the laundry list of issues was something that dominated a large number of my discussions with writers who wanted to express their feelings about what a bone head move it was (while trying to find out  how the film was - because they were certain I would see it and cover it).

I don't know how the film was but I went by the red carpet by accident and there were only two photographers from outlets that covered everything regardless.

I also should say that AI maybe more wide spread than we think. I quietly asked about some details about a couple of films and I was shut down and said that I shouldn't write about that or that if I was going to credit anything I should credit a certain person.  The original question was not  an AI question, however the answer made me think that the films had used AI since the people they wanted credited seemingly had no background in that area (say music). I think perhaps people are using it but will never admit to it.

I have no idea what Tribeca is going to do next year but they probably should get a position and stick to it.

ADDENDUM- With the release of YOUNG WASHINGTON a Tribeca film ended up in trouble with writers and creatives when it was announced that AI was apparently used a great greal in the making of the film. I note this because during the Tribeca screening I was at the director said almost everything was done in camera and the only computer assist was during the ice flow sequence because it couldn't be shot in camera without there being danger to cast and crew.  More recent conversations had him saying there was more and that AI was heavily used which cause some people to walk away from a film they liked- in part because of the AI and in part because of the dishonesty.

Before I sit down and write a review I have a thought about Supergirl (2026)

I am seriously considering making SUPERGIRL number one on the Best of 2026 list- not because its a great movie- it's not-it's flawed (a review is coming). I want to put it at the top of the list becuase the little girls at the screening I attended- and one little girl in full Supergirl costume- came out of the screening happy, engaged and running around as if they were the hero on the screen. Rarely have I ever seen such engagement from an audience not such absolute joy.

To all the basement dwelling misogynists and movie fan boys and bros who wanted to piss on the film - you're absolutely screwed. The film is not going anywhere. 

SUPERGIRL is going to be a cult hit long term and Milly Alcock is going to be someone generations of girls look up to. Trust me this film is going to find it's audience and blossm. It's audience is going to be all the marginalized little girls who don't feel they fit in and who feel broken and like they don't belong.  This is a film for all the girls who have to take the abuse from the dick heads and nimrods like the one throwing brickbats at the film and delighting in the "failure" of a female headed film.  This is a film that is going to show them that they can stand up, they can fight back and that they can be good even if they aren't polite or nice.

SUPERGIRL will, in the long term, change lives and live deeply in the hearts of a hell of a lot of people once they discover it. 

I know  DC may not like that short term, but long term they have a cash cow if they want it.

Alien 2: On Earth (1980)

 

One year after the release of Ridley Scott’s 1979 horror masterpiece, Alien, and six years before James Cameron’s epic, Aliens, international crowds were treated to a different kind of follow up.


Alien 2: On Earth (translated to Alien 2 - Sulla Terra)


Director Ciro Ippolito, also known by the U.S. pseudonym Sam Cromwell, reportedly got the idea after seeing the box office success of fellow countryman Lucio Fulci’s Zombi 2. An in-name-only sequel to George Romero’s Dawn of the Dead, which had been released in Italy as Zombi.


These sorts of situations were surprisingly common. As I briefly mentioned in my previous review of Son of Sleepaway Camp, there wasn’t really a government approval process for movie titles. Instead, it was largely up to the rights holder—in this case 20th Century Fox—to notice and pursue legal action. And that’s exactly what happened.


Fox objected around the time of the film’s release and reportedly attempted to stop distribution. Despite those efforts, Alien 2: On Earth still made it to theaters. According to Ippolito, Fox’s legal challenge ultimately failed in part because “Alien” was considered a generic term and not something the studio could exclusively claim.


Whether audiences were being misled is another discussion entirely. That’s a fair argument to make. But we’re also talking about an Italian exploitation film released in 1980, operating under a very different legal and cultural landscape than the one studios face today.


This wasn’t the only Alien-inspired knock-off to catch the eye of Fox. During the production of Luigi Cozzi’s Contamination (1980), the idea was reportedly floated to release the film as “Alien Arrives on Earth”. Fox got wind of that and quickly put an end to the idea, forcing a title change beforehand. Funny enough, it was still released as Alien Contamination in some markets.


Back to Alien 2: On Earth. What works. What doesn’t, etc. The plot follows a group of cave explorers who stumble across mysterious extraterrestrial rocks after a returning space capsule crashes back to Earth.


Now, if you just said to yourself, “Cave explorers? Why does that sound like Neil Marshall’s The Descent?” I’d accuse you of being Ciro Ippolito himself if I thought there was any chance that he would ever see this.


But no. Years later, Ippolito unsuccessfully attempted to sue the makers of The Descent, claiming the two films were too similar because both involved explorers trapped underground with a mysterious creature. That’s just stupid.


Anyway, let’s get to the few standouts. And one of them is indeed the cave itself. The Castellana Caves in Italy can certainly trigger a few claustrophobic nightmares. It’s a great setting, and the film makes use of it. Not entirely good use, just use. 



Combine that with the practical gore effects these types of movies always seemed to deliver on, and you’ve got one of Alien 2’s strengths (and weaknesses). You can throw a gallon of blood at the screen, but if it looks cheap, then it looks cheap. Not getting into specifics, but it certainly has those underwhelming moments.


The padding is extravagant. It’s almost as if you’re watching everything unfold in real time. It takes more than half of its run time before you see anything the title might suggest. Or, in this case, pulsing moon rocks. More on that in a second. The acting & dubbing are awkward, to say the least. The way the characters behave towards each other, it just doesn’t work with the line reading. 


About that Alien, though. Yeah, see, that’s sort of the problem. You never see one. It’s more like… a tentacle, or tentacles. When you call your movie Alien 2, you should probably have some kind of budget for, literally anything. Aside from rocks. 


When the surviving members of the team finally make it back into town, the city streets are completely empty, meaning, everyone’s dead? Sure. The climax happens at a bowling alley, which never feels nearly as important as the movie thinks it is. The final sequence with the “Alien” is a POV shot of what might be its mouth. Stomach. Asshole. Who knows. The latter option seems the most fitting.



Ippolito, who was also the producer, initially wanted Mario Bava to direct. Bava passed (smart move), and what we’re left with is a weird little footnote in Alien history.


The movie may not have a Xenomorph, but it does have… whatever this is supposed to be.



Dave vs. Hollywood (2026) Dances With Films 2026


An eternally hopeful actor with limited ability tries to hit it big in Hollywood.

Wickedly funny and often uncomfortable look at what it takes to get a head in Tinsel Town. This is a brutal no holds bar look at the whys and hows things get done in Hollywood and an explanation as to why people keep plugging along despit having no real hance in hell to make it big.

I laughed and I winced. Having friends who have tried the Hollywood game I got a sense of how on the nose some of this is.

I laughed. I want to see it again because I saw this in the wind down from Tribeca so I know I didn't give it my full attention. I also want to see it again because its funny.

Recommended

Friday, June 26, 2026

Georgia O'Keeffe: The Brightness of Light


This is  a look at the life and art of artist Georgia O'Keeffe.

I'm torn about this film. I like the film, but I am very frustrated by it.

This is a film that has huge amount of information on O'Keeffe. In it's way it is everything you could ever hop to know about her. The trouble is that the film doesn't give us everything we need to know. What it does is that it will mention something like O'Keeffe giving a donations so that Black Americans could see art, but it doesn't explain what that did. Another time the film talks about how O'Keeffe broke with a friend of 50 years because she wrote a biography of the artist. O'Keeffe turned had worked on the book and then simply broke. Why? We don't know. There are other examples, which makes this film really good but not wholly successful.

It's not a bad, it frustrated. I kept wanting to stop the film and email the filmmakers.

If you love the artist, try the film.

My Appreciation for the Worst Jaws Film (Jaws: The Revenge - 1987)

It’s July 1987, and somehow I convinced my mother to take me to the movies to see Revenge of the Nerds II. Listen, I was a kid, okay? One of the few things I recall is how empty the theatre was. Shocking, I know. But what I remember most were the trailers. Or more specifically, one trailer.

The iconic voice narration. A sweeping view of the ocean. That unmistakable theme. Then, bam. The title card.

Jaws: The Revenge.

I was only six years old, and I was already very familiar with Jaws. Whether that was from the original or one of the sequels, who knows? What I do remember is the excitement that trailer generated. For the next 90 minutes, while the Nerds were off on whatever hijinks they were getting into, all I could think about was one thing:

Wow… there’s a new Jaws movie. Better yet, it was coming out in just a few weeks.


Then I saw it.

Look, I get it. I’m not going to go on a diatribe about how this is some misunderstood piece of art. Anyone who has seen it, or even just knows of it, is aware of its absurdity.

And maybe that’s part of the reason I love it. The shark in Jaws: The Revenge isn’t just a shark. It’s the aquatic Jason Voorhees. Its one objective is to kill every single member of the Brody family. And also kill Michael Caine’s character, who is definitely a drug smuggler. They never officially say it, but c’mon.

You could make the case that Jaws 2 is where the series stopped trying to be Jaws. I like that one, but it’s essentially an underwater slasher film. Jaws 3-D was simply cashing in on the trend at the time. Then Jaws: The Revenge came along and someone said, “Hear me out… psychic powers.”

If your argument is, “Look how they massacred my boy,” then I really don’t have a rebuttal.

So, the shark uses its X-Men-type abilities to pursue Lorraine Gary, who came out of retirement for this. None of it should work, and technically doesn’t. I’m here for the ridiculousness, regardless.

The novelization at least attempts to explain the psychic angle, revealing that the shark is being controlled by voodoo. In the film, it’s little more than a throwaway line.

Roy Scheider knew better, so he gets the “died off-screen” treatment.

There’s some family drama and a forced romance angle. I can take or leave all of that. The moments when the shark actually appears are entertaining in all the wrong ways.


When we reach the final act, the shark roars like a lion. It explodes because of a… shark tracker? It’s unclear. Mario Van Peebles somehow survives being dragged to the bottom of the ocean in the shark’s mouth. The last shot gives us our survivors floating in what is very clearly a tank on the Universal lot, against a sky matte painting straight out of The Truman Show.

None of this is a compelling defense of Jaws: The Revenge. Most of the criticism aimed at it over the years is deserved. The movie is illogical, frequently nonsensical, and completely detached from the grounded suspense that made the original a classic.

I still enjoy it.

Maybe it’s the nostalgia. Maybe it’s the tie-in Nintendo game that was released later that year. Maybe it’s the fact that the movie completely loses its mind during the finale. Whatever the reason, I’ve never been able to dislike it.

And as Michael Caine once said, he’s never seen the movie, but he has seen the house it bought for his mother. That’s a lovely touch.