The film tells the dual story of Raphael Lemkin, the man who coined the word genocide and who worked to make sure that those commit it can be legally punished. He was the man who work to get the idea of crimes against humanity to become a legal one. At the same time the film follows several cases of genocide (Darfur, Bosnia, Rwanda...) and we meet people who are fighting to put a stop to it.
Visually alive with animation and text that fills the screen this is a flashy film that almost has too much going on. The film has this need to tell us and show us all these wondrous things whether we need to see them or not. It kind of matches the narrative which not only tells Lemkin's story but those of the modern genocides. .
For me the interesting bits are Lemkin's. He's a name I'd run across before in reading on genocide, but he was never someone I knew anything about. For me seeing his story is what makes this film worth seeing, not the retelling of the stories of the modern crimes against humanity. Yes I know we learn the stories of other people who have picked up Lemkin's work but they are nowhere near as interesting as the man himself (you'll notice I'm not mentioning anyone's name that because I didn't write anyone's name down.)
To be fair this isn't a bad film, its actually quite good if overly busy and perhaps too long (it's over two hours). Following the fairness line of thought. I want to revisit the film away from the film festival where I can take it on it's own terms. Perhaps when it opens i theaters this fall.
Plays later today and 19. For more details go to the festival website